ÃŽ Ã¦Ã³Ã°Ã­Ã Ã«Ã¥ Ñîäåðæàíèå íîìåðîâ Ã�åäàêöèîííûé ñîâåò Òðåáîâàíèÿ ê Ã¬Ã Ã²Ã¥Ã°Ã¨Ã Ã«Ã Ã¬ äëÿ Ã¯Ã³Ã¡Ã«Ã¨ÃªÃ Ã¶Ã¨Ã¨ Îôîðìëåíèå áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêîãî ñïèñêà Îðãàíèçàöèÿ è Ã¯Ã®Ã°Ã¿Ã¤Ã®Ãª ðåöåíçèðîâàíèÿ Ã�îäïèñêà íà Ã¦Ã³Ã°Ã­Ã Ã« Èçäàòåëüñòâî Ã�åäàêöèîííàÿ ýòèêà Ñòðàíèöà ãëàâíîãî ðåäàêòîðà
 

Æóðíàë «Ã‹Ã¥Ã±Ã­Ã®Ã© âåñòíèê / Forestry Bulletin»

Ê ñïèñêó íîìåðîâ

 

Íàçâàíèå
æóðíàëà

Âåñòíèê Ìîñêîâñêîãî ãîñóäàðñòâåííîãî óíèâåðñèòåòà ëåñà Ëåñíîé âåñòíèê

 

ISSN/Êîä ÍÝÁ

1727-3749 / 17273749

Äàòà

2015/2015

Òîì

19

Âûïóñê

2

Ñòðàíèöû

6-184

Âñåãî ñòàòåé

28

 

ËÅÑÍÎÅ ÕÎÇßÉÑÒÂÎ

 

 

1

ÁÈÎËÎÃÎ-ÒÅÎÐÅÒÈ×ÅÑÊÈÉ ÀÍÀËÈÇ ÑÏÎÑÎÁΠÎÁÅÑÊÐÛËÈÂÀÍÈß ÑÅÌßÍ ÌÅËÊÎÑÅÌÅÍÍÛÕ ÄÅÐÅÂÜÅ ÕÂÎÉÍÛÕ ÏÎÐÎÄ

6-10

 

À.Ð. ÐÎÄÈÍ, ïðîô. ÌÃÓË, çàñë. ëåñîâîä ÐÑÔÑÐ, ä-ð ñ.-õ. íàóê

Å.À. ÊÀËÀØÍÈÊÎÂÀ, ïðîô. ÐÃÀÓ–ÌÑÕÀ èìåíè Ê.À. Òèìèðÿçåâà, ä-ð áèîë. íàóê

kalash0407@mail.ru

 ÔÃÁÎÓ ÂÏÎ «Ìîñêîâñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé óíèâåðñèòåò ëåñà»

 141005, Ìîñêîâñêàÿ îáë., ã. Ìûòèùè-5, óë. 1-ÿ Èíñòèòóòñêàÿ, ä. 1, ÌÃÓË

 ÔÃÁÎÓ ÂÎ «Ðîññèéñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé àãðàðíûé óíèâåðñèòåò–ÌÑÕÀ èìåíè Ê.À. Òèìèðÿçåâà»,

 Ìîñêâà, 127550, óë. Òèìèðÿçåâñêàÿ, ä.49

Ïðèâîäèòñÿ áèîëîãî-òåîðåòè÷åñêèé àíàëèç ñóùåñòâóþùèõ ñïîñîáîâ ìåõàíè÷åñêîãî è âëàæíîãî îáåñêðûëèâàíèÿ ñåìÿí õâîéíûõ ïîðîä. Ïðîâîäèòñÿ ñðàâíåíèå ðîññèéñêèõ è øâåäñêèõ òåõíîëîãèé îáåñêðûëèâàíèÿ ñåìÿí õâîéíûõ ïîðîä. Àâòîðàìè óòâåðæäàåòñÿ, ÷òî ïðèìåíåíèå ìàøèí ÌÎÑ-1 è ÌÎÑ-1À äëÿ î÷èñòêè è ñîðòèðîâêè ñåìåííîãî ìàòåðèàëà íåæåëàòåëüíî, òàê êàê èõ èñïîëüçîâàíèå ïðèâîäèò ê ìåõàíè÷åñêèì ïîâðåæäåíèÿì ñåìÿí, ÷òî ïðèâîäèò ê ñíèæåíèþ èõ ïîñåâíûõ êà÷åñòâ è ñîêðàùåíèþ ñðîêà õðàíåíèÿ. Íàèáîëåå ïåðñïåêòèâíûé ñïîñîá – «âëàæíûé», òàê êàê îí èñêëþ÷àåò òðàâìèðîâàíèå ñåìåííîãî ìàòåðèàëà è íå ñíèæàåò ïîñåâíûå êà÷åñòâà ñåìÿí. Ýòîò ñïîñîá ïðåäóñìàòðèâàåò ðàâíîìåðíîå óâëàæíåíèå ñåìÿí è îòäåëåíèå îò íèõ êðûëàòîê. Äàííûé ñïîñîá îáåñêðûëèâàíèÿ ñåìÿí ìåëêîñåìåííûõ äåðåâüåâ õâîéíûõ ïîðîä øèðîêî ïðèìåíÿåòñÿ íà ïðàêòèêå â ëåñíîì õîçÿéñòâå â Øâåöèè. Ïðåäëàãàåìûé ñïîñîá îáåñêðûëèâàíèÿ ñåìÿí ÿâëÿåòñÿ ýêîëîãè÷åñêè îïðàâäàííûì, ñîõðàíÿþùèì æèçíåñïîñîáíîñòü è ãåíåòè÷åñêîå ñîñòîÿíèå ñåìÿí. Êðîìå òîãî, ýòîò ñïîñîá ýêîíîìè÷åñêè îïðàâäàí, òàê êàê ñòîèìîñòü ñåìÿí âåñüìà âåëèêà, â Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè 1 êã ñåìÿí ñòîèò îêîëî 100$ ÑØÀ, à â Øâåöèè – 2–3 òûñ. $ ÑØÀ. Îäíàêî â ïðåäëàãàåìîé òåõíîëîãèè íå ïðèâîäÿòñÿ ðåæèìû è ïðîäîëæèòåëüíîñòü âñåõ âûïîëíÿåìûõ îïåðàöèé, íàïðèìåð, ñåïàðàöèÿ, ïîäñóøêà è ò.ä. Ïîýòîìó äëÿ øèðîêîãî âíåäðåíèÿ â ïðîèçâîäñòâî «âëàæíîãî» ñïîñîáà îáåñêðûëèâàíèÿ ñåìÿí íåîáõîäèìî ïðîâîäèòü äîïîëíèòåëüíûå èññëåäîâàíèÿ ïî îïòèìèçàöèè äàííîãî òåõíîëîãè÷åñêîãî ïðîöåññà. Íåîáõîäèìî îïòèìèçèðîâàòü êàæäóþ îïåðàöèþ, íàïðèìåð, ìîùíîñòü ñëîÿ ñåìÿí, ïîäëåæàùèõ îáåñêðûëèâàíèþ è ñòåïåíü åãî óâëàæíåíèÿ, ïåðèîäè÷íîñòü âîðîøåíèÿ è ïðèìåíÿåìîå ïðè ýòîì îðóäèå, ïðîäîëæèòåëüíîñòü óâëàæíåíèÿ, òåõíîëîãèÿ îòâåèâàíèÿ è äðóãèå îïåðàöèè.

Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: îáåñêðûëèâàíèå, ìèêðîïîâðåæäåíèÿ, ñåïàðàöèÿ, õðàíåíèå, ãåíåòè÷åñêîå ñîñòîÿíèå, áèîëîãè÷åñêàÿ ýíåðãèÿ.

Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê

1. Ãëàäêè, Ì. Î íåêîòîðûõ ïåðñïåêòèâíûõ òåõíîëîãèÿõ ëåñíîãî ñåìåíîâîäñòâà è ïèòîìíè÷åñêîãî äåëà (èç øâåäñêîãî îïûòà) / Ì. Ãëàäêè, À. Ïðîêàçèí, È. Ðóòêîâñêèé // Ëåñîõîçÿéñòâåííàÿ èíôîðìàöèÿ. – Ì.: ÂÍÈÈËÌ, 2004. – ¹ 1. – Ñ. 52–62.

2. Êîíöåïöèÿ Ôåäåðàëüíîé öåëåâîé ïðîãðàììû «Ðàçâèòèå ëåñíîãî ñåìåíîâîäñòâà íà ïåðèîä 2009 – 2020 ãã.» – Ëåñíàÿ Ðîññèÿ, 2008. – ¹ 9. – Ñ. 9–15.

3. Ëåâèí, Â.È. Íîâîå â áèîëîãèè è òåõíîëîãèè õðàíåíèÿ ñåìÿí çåðíîâûõ êóëüòóð è ïðîäîâîëüñòâåííîãî çåðíà / Â. È. Ëåâèí. – Ðÿçàíü: Íèâà Ðÿçàíè, 2004. – ¹ 2(67). – Ñ. 11–14.

4. Ðîäèí, À. Ð. Ïðîãíîçèðîâàíèå êà÷åñòâà ñåìÿí ëåñíûõ ðàñòåíèé ïðè äëèòåëüíîì õðàíåíèè. Èñêóññòâåííîå ëåñîâûðàùèâàíèå / À.Ð. Ðîäèí. – Èçáðàííûå òðóäû. Ïóøêèíî:ÂÍÈÈËÌ, 2012. – 198 ñ.

5. Îçîëèí, Â.Ï. Âîäíîå îáåñêðûëèâàíèå ñåìÿí ñîñíû è åëè // Â.Ï. Îçîëèí / Ëåñíîå õîçÿéñòâî. 1962. – ¹ 8. – Ñ. 78.

6. Óêàçàíèÿ ïî ëåñíîìó ñåìåíîâîäñòâó â Ðîññèéñêîé Ôåäåðàöèè / Ôåäåðàëüíàÿ ñëóæáà ëåñíîãî õîçÿéñòâà Ðîñèè. – Ì.: ÂÍÈÈÖëåñðåñóðñ, 2000. – 197 ñ.

7. Ïðåèìóùåñòâà ñêàíäèíàâñêèõ òåõíîëîãèé ïåðåðàáîòêè ëåñîñåìåííîãî ñûðüÿ, ñåìÿí è ïðîèçâîäñòâî ïîñàäî÷íîãî ìàòåðèàëà ñ çàêðûòîé êîðíåâîé ñèñòåìîé. – Ëåñíàÿ Ðîññèÿ, 2008. – ¹ 9. – Ñ. 34–35.

8. http://www.lessnab.karelia.ru

9. Ìàðêîâà, È.À. Ñîâðåìåííûå ïðîáëåìû ëåñîâûðàùèâàíèÿ (ëåñîêóëüòóðíîå ïðîèçâîäñòâî) / È.À. Ìàðêîâà. – Ó÷åáíîå ïîñîáèå. – ÑÏá: ÑÏá ËÒÀ. 2009. – 144 ñ.

10. Ðåéìåðñ Ô.Ý. Ðàñòåíèÿ âî ìëàäåí÷åñòâå. / Ô.Ý. Ðàéìåðñ. 2-èçä. – Íîâîñèáèðñê: Íàóêà, 1987. – 118 ñ.

11. Ðîäèí, À.Ð. Ëåñíûå êóëüòóðû / À.Ð. Ðîäèí, Å.À. Êàëàøíèêîâà, Ñ.À. Ðîäèí: ó÷åáíèê. – Ì.: ÌÃÓË, 2011.– 316 ñ.

12. Êàçàêîâ, Â.È. Òåõíîëîãèÿ è ìåõàíèçàöèÿ âûðàùèâàíèÿ ïîñàäî÷íîãî ìàòåðèàëà â ïèòîìíèêàõ ëåñíîé çîíû / Â.È. Êàçàêîâ. – Ì.: ÂÍÈÈËÌ, 2001. – 186 ñ.

13. Ðîäèí, À.Ð. Èñïîëüçîâàíèå ìåòîäîâ ìàòåìàòè÷åñêîãî ïëàíèðîâàíèÿ â íàó÷íûõ ýêñïåðèìåíòàõ ïðè ïîìîùè ÝÂÌ. Ìåòîäè÷åñêèå óêàçàíèÿ äëÿ àñïèðàíòîâ, ñòàæåðîâ, íàó÷íûõ ðàáîòíèêîâ / À.Ð. Ðîäèí, Å.À. Êàëàøíèêîâà, À.Ä. Çàõàðîâ, Ñ.Ë. Ðûñèí. – Ì.: ÌÃÓË, 1998. – 17 ñ.

BiologCAL and theoretical analysis OF THE SEEDWINGS severing

 METHODS OF small-seeded conifers

Rodin A.R., Prof. MSFU, Dr.Sci (Agricultural); Kalashnikova E.A., Prof. RGAU-MSHA K.A. Timiryazeva, Dr.Sci. (Biol.)

kalash0407@mail.ru

 Moscow State Forest University (MSFU), 1st Institutskaya st., 1, 141005, Mytischi, Moscow reg., Russia

 Russian State Agrarian University - Moscow Agricultural Academy named after K.A. Timiryazev Russia,

 Moscow 127550, Timiryazevskaya st., 49

The article provides the biological–theoretical analysis of the available ways of mechanical and wet seed wings severing methods of the coniferous species. A comparison of Russian and Swedish coniferous species seed wings severing technologies is given. The authors claim that seed cleaning and sorting by MOS-1 and MOS-1A machines is undesirable, since it results in mechanical damage of the seeds with further lowering of the seed sowing quality and reduction of seed shelf life. The wet seed wings severing method is considered to be the most promising one, as it eliminates seed injury and does not reduce seed sowing qualitiy. This method provides uniform seed wetting and wing separation. It is widely used for wet seed wings severing of small-seeded coniferous species in the Swedish forestry. The method is ecologically justified in preserving the viability and genetic condition of the seeds. This method is also economically justified, since the cost of seeds is very high, and the cost of 1 kg. seeds is about 100 $ in the Russian Federation and 2000-3000 $ in Sweden. However, the given wet seed wings severing technology does not provide the schedule and durations of all operations, for example, separation, drying and etc, performed. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct additional studies to optimize the processes for its future widespread introduction into practice. It is necessary to optimize the performance of each operation, for example, the layer thickness of the seeds to be severed and its degree of hydration, the frequency of turning and the instrument applied, the duration of wetting, winnowing technology and other operations.

Keywords: seed severing, microdamages, separation, storage, genetic condition, biological energy.

References

1. Gladki M. O nekotorykh perspektivnykh tekhnologiyakh lesnogo semenovodstva i pitomnicheskogo dela (iz shvedskogo opyta) [Some promising technologies forest seed and nursery business (from the Swedish experience)] Lesokhozyaistvennaya informatsiya. Moscow: VNIILM, 2004. ¹ 1. pp. 52-62.

2. Kontseptsiya Federal’noi tselevoi programmy «Razvitie lesnogo semenovodstva na period 2009 – 2020 gg.» [Concept of the Federal Target Program «Development of forest seed for the period 2009 – 2020 years.»]. Lesnaya Rossiya, 2008. ¹ 9. pp. 9-15.

3. Levin V.I. Novoe v biologii i tekhnologii khraneniya semyan zernovykh kul’tur i prodovol’stvennogo zerna [New in biology and technology for storage of cereal seeds and food grains]. Ryazan’: Niva Ryazani, 2004. ¹ 2(67). pp. 11-14.

4. Rodin A.R. Prognozirovanie kachestva semyan lesnykh rastenii pri dlitel’nom khranenii. Iskusstvennoe lesovyrashchivanie e [Prediction of quality forest seed during storage. Artificial forest growing]. Pushkino:VNIILM, 2012. 198 p.

5. Ozolin V.P. Vodnoe obeskrylivanie semyan sosny i eli [Water obeskrylivanie seeds of pine and spruce]. Lesnoe khozyaistvo. 1962. ¹ 8. pp. 78.

6. Ukazaniya po lesnomu semenovodstvu v Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Dvice on forest seed in the Russian Federation]. Federal’naya sluzhba lesnogo khozyaistva Rosii. Moscow: VNIIClesresurs, 2000. 197 p.

7. Preimushchestva skandinavskikh tekhnologii pererabotki lesosemennogo syr’ya, semyan i proizvodstvo posadochnogo materiala s zakrytoi kornevoi sistemoi [The advantages of the Scandinavian forest seed materials processing technologies, production of seeds and planting material with closed root system]. Lesnaya Rossiya. 2008. ¹ 9. pp. 34-35.

8. http://www.lessnab.karelia.ru

9. Markova I.A. Sovremennye problemy lesovyrashchivaniya (lesokul’turnoe proizvodstvo) [Modern problems of forest cultivation (silvicultural production)]. SPb: SPbLTA. 2009. 144 p.

10. Reimers F.E. Rasteniya vo mladenchestve [Plants in infancy]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1987. 118 p.

11. Rodin A.R. Lesnye kul’tury [Forest plantations]. Moscow: MSFU, 2001. 316 p.

12. Kazakov V.I. Tekhnologiya i mekhanizatsiya vyrashchivaniya posadochnogo materiala v pitomnikakh lesnoi zony [Technology and mechanization of growing seedlings in nurseries forest zone]. Moscow: VNIILM, 2001. 186 p.

13. Rodin A.R. Ispol’zovanie metodov matematicheskogo planirovaniya v nauchnykh eksperimentakh pri pomoshchi EVM. Metodicheskie ukazaniya dlya aspirantov, stazherov, nauchnykh rabotnikov [Using the methods of mathematical planning of scientific experiments using a computer. Methodological guidelines for graduate students, interns, researchers]. Moscow: MSFU, 1998. 17 p.

 

2

ÐÀÇÐÀÁÎÒÊÀ ÂÎËÞÌÎÌÅÒÐÈ×ÅÑÊÎÃÎ ÌÅÒÎÄÀ ÈÇÌÅÐÅÍÈß ÎÁÚÅÌÀ ÕÂÎÈ ÏÐÈ ÁÈÎÈÍÄÈÊÀÖÈÈ ÇÀÃÐßÇÍÅÍÈß ÀÒÌÎÑÔÅÐÍÎÃÎ ÂÎÇÄÓÕÀ

11-14

 

Î.À. ÅÑßÊÎÂÀ, äîö. êàô. ïðîìûøëåííîé ýêîëîãèè, ïðîöåññîâ è àïïàðàòîâ õèìè÷åñêèõ ïðîèçâîäñòâ ÑèáÃÒÓ, êàíä. áèîë. íàóê,

Ð.À. ÑÒÅÏÅÍÜ, ïðîô. êàô. ïðîìûøëåííîé ýêîëîãèè, ïðîöåññîâ è àïïàðàòîâ õèìè÷åñêèõ ïðîèçâîäñòâ ÑèáÃÒÓ, ä-ð áèîë. íàóê

olga-la83@mail.ru, stepen.rob@yandex.ru

ÔÃÁÎÓ ÂÏÎ «Ñèáèðñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé òåõíîëîãè÷åñêèé óíèâåðñèòåò»

 Ðîññèÿ, 660049, Êðàñíîÿðñê, ïð. Ìèðà, 82

Êîëè÷åñòâåííàÿ îöåíêà çàãðÿçíÿþùèõ âîçäóøíóþ ñðåäó êîìïîíåíòîâ, ïðîâîäèìàÿ ñ ïîìîùüþ áèîèíäèêàöèîííûõ ìåòîäîâ, ïîçâîëÿåò ïîëó÷èòü áîëåå äîñòîâåðíûå è îáúåêòèâíûå ðåçóëüòàòû. Çàäà÷åé èññëåäîâàíèÿ ÿâëÿëàñü ðàçðàáîòêà ìåòîäà èçìåðåíèÿ îáúåìà õâîè äåðåâüåâ êàê áèîèíäèêàöèîííîãî ïîêàçàòåëÿ çàãðÿçíåíèÿ ãîðîäñêîé âîçäóøíîé ñðåäû. Ðàçðàáîòàí ïðèáîð äëÿ èçìåðåíèÿ îáúåìà õâîè, ïðåäñòàâëÿþùèé öèëèíäð, âíóòðè êîòîðîãî ðàñïîëàãàåòñÿ ïîðøåíü, ñîñòîÿùèé èç øòîêà ñ çàêðåïëåííûì íà íåì çîíòîì èç âîäîñòîéêîãî ìåëêîÿ÷åèñòîãî ìàòåðèàëà. Ñîâìåùåíèå ðèñêè íà øòîêå ñ óðîâíåì âîäû â öèëèíäðå äî è ïîñëå ïîìåùåíèÿ õâîè â öèëèíäð îïðåäåëÿåò îáúåì èññëåäóåìîãî êîëè÷åñòâà õâîè.  õîäå èññëåäîâàíèÿ ïðîâåäåíî ñðàâíåíèå ðåçóëüòàòîâ îïðåäåëåíèÿ îáúåìà õâîè åëè ñèáèðñêîé, îòîáðàííîé èç ñðåäíåé ÷àñòè êðîíû äåðåâüåâ, ðàçðàáîòàííûì è ìîðôîìåòðè÷åñêèì ìåòîäàìè. Ñðàâíåíèå ïîëó÷åííûõ äàííûõ ïîêàçûâàåò, ÷òî ìîðôîìåòðè÷åñêèå èçìåðåíèÿ ïðåâûøàþò âîëþìîìåòðè÷åñêèå ïî÷òè íà 12 %. Òàêîé ðåçóëüòàò îáúÿñíÿåòñÿ ôîðìîé õâîè, íå ó÷èòûâàåìîé ïðè ðàñ÷åòå îáúåìà îáðàçöîâ ìîðôîìåòðè÷åñêèì ñïîñîáîì. Îáúåêòèâíûé õàðàêòåð àíàëèçà âîëþìîìåòðè÷åñêèì ìåòîäîì óêàçûâàåò è íèçêàÿ âåëè÷èíà êîýôôèöèåíòà âàðüèðîâàíèÿ ðåçóëüòàòîâ èçìåðåíèÿ. Îáúåì õâîè åëè ñèáèðñêîé, îïðåäåëÿåìûé âîëþìîìåòðè÷åñêèì ìåòîäîì, èñïîëüçîâàëñÿ â êà÷åñòâå èíäèêàòîðà çàãðÿçíåíèÿ âîçäóøíîé ãîðîäñêîé ñðåäû. Íà ïðèìåðå ïðîìûøëåííîãî öåíòðà Ñèáèðè ïðîâåäåíà îöåíêà àýðîãåííîãî çàãðÿçíåíèÿ â ðàçíûõ ðàéîíàõ ãîðîäà Êðàñíîÿðñêà ïî èçìåðåííîìó îáúåìó õâîè âîëþìîìåòðè÷åñêèì ïóòåì. Ïðè àíàëèçå ðåçóëüòàòîâ èçìåðåíèé ó÷èòûâàëèñü ñïåöèôè÷åñêèå âûáðîñû ïðåäïðèÿòèé è âûõëîïíûå ãàçû àâòîòðàíñïîðòà.  êà÷åñòâå ó÷àñòêîâ ñ áëàãîïðèÿòíîé îêðóæàþùåé ñðåäîé áûëè èññëåäîâàíû çàãîðîäíûå äðåâîñòîè. Ðåçóëüòàòû îöåíêè ýêîëîãè÷åñêîé íàãðóçêè íà âîçäóøíóþ ñðåäó, ïîëó÷åííûå âîëþìîìåòðè÷åñêèì ñïîñîáîì, ñîãëàñóþòñÿ ñ äàííûìè ìîðôîìåòðè÷åñêèõ èçìåðåíèé àíàëîãè÷íûõ ó÷àñòêîâ èññëåäîâàíèÿ. Ðàçðàáîòàííûé ïðèáîð äëÿ îïðåäåëåíèÿ îáúåìà îáðàçöîâ íåïðàâèëüíîé ôîðìû ïîçâîëÿåò ïîëó÷èòü áîëåå òî÷íûå è äîñòîâåðíûå ðåçóëüòàòû ïðè ïðîâåäåíèè áèîèíäèêàöèîííûõ èññëåäîâàíèé.

Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: áèîèíäèêàöèÿ, âîëþìîìåòðè÷åñêèé ìåòîä, åëü ñèáèðñêàÿ, àíòðîïîãåííîå çàãðÿçíåíèå âîçäóøíîé ñðåäû

Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê

1. Åñÿêîâà, Î.À. Çîíèðîâàíèå çàãðÿçíåíèÿ àòìîñôåðû ã. Êðàñíîÿðñêà áèîèíäèêàöèîííûìè ìåòîäàìè: ìîíîãðàôèÿ / Î.À. Åñÿêîâà, Ð.À. Ñòåïåíü. – Êðàñíîÿðñê: ÑèáÃÒÓ, 2011. – 124 ñ.

2. Ìèõàéëîâà, Ò.À. Êîìïëåêñíàÿ ýêîëîãè÷åñêàÿ îöåíêà ñîñòîÿíèÿ ëåñîâ Òàéøåòñêîãî ðàéîíà ïåðåä çàïóñêîì àëþìèíèåâîãî ïðîèçâîäñòâà â ã. Òàéøåò / Ò.À. Ìèõàéëîâà [è äð.]. – Èðêóòñê: Èíñòèòóò ãåîãðàôèè ÑÎ ÐÀÍ, 2005. – 159 ñ.

3. Î ñîñòîÿíèè è îõðàíå îêðóæàþùåé ñðåäû â Êðàñíîÿðñêîì êðàå çà 2012 ãîä: Ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé äîêëàä. – Êðàñíîÿðñê, 2013. – 450 ñ.

4. Îíó÷èí, À.À. Ñòðóêòóðíî-ôóíêöèîíàëüíûå èçìåíåíèÿ õâîè ñîñíû ïîä âëèÿíèåì ïîëëþòàíòîâ â ëåñîñòåïíîé çîíå Ñðåäíåé Ñèáèðè / À.À. Îíó÷èí, Ë.Í. Êîçëîâà // Ëåñîâåäåíèå. – 1993. – ¹ 2. – Ñ. 39–42.

5. Ïàò. íà ïîëåçíóþ ìîäåëü 89222 Ðîññèéñêàÿ ôåäåðàöèÿ. Ïðèáîð äëÿ èçìåðåíèÿ îáúåìà õâîè / Ñòåïåíü Ð.À., Åñÿêîâà Î.À., Àìáàðöóìÿí Î.Í., Ìàðòîíèê Å.Â. (ÐÔ) çàÿâèòåëü è ïàòåíòîîáëàäàòåëü Ñèáèðñê. ãîñ. òåõíîë. óí-ò. – ¹ 2009124953/22; çàÿâë. 29.06.09; îïóáë. 27.11.09, Áþë. ¹ 33. – 3 ñ.

6. Ñîêîëîâ, Ä.Á. Äðåâåñèíîâåäåíèå : ó÷åá. ïîñîáèå / Ä.Á. Ñîêîëîâ, À.Ë. Ñèíüêåâè÷, Ï.À. Åìåëüÿíîâà. – Ë.: ËÒÀ, 1974. – 61 ñ.

7. Ïàò. 2196327 Ðîññèéñêàÿ Ôåäåðàöèÿ, ÌÏÊ7 G 01 N 33/46, À 01 G 23/00. Ñïîñîá èñïûòàíèÿ äðåâåñíûõ ðàñòåíèé / Ìàçóðêèí Ï.Ì., Êîëåñíèêîâà À.À. (ÐÔ); çàÿâèòåëü è ïàòåíòîîáëàäàòåëü Ìàðèéñê. ãîñ. òåõ. óí-ò. – ¹ 2001115402/13; çàÿâë. 04.06.01; îïóáë. 10.01.03, Áþë. ¹ 1. – 2 ñ.

8. Manninen S. Scots pine needles as bioindicators of sulphur deposition / S. Manninen, S. Huttunen // Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 1995. – Vol. 25, ¹ 10. – P. 1559-1569.

9. Tichy J. Impact of atmospheric deposition on the status of planted Norway spruce stands: a comparative study between sites in southern Sweden and the northeastern Czech Republic / J. Tichy // Environmental Pollution. 1996. – 93, ¹ 3. – P. 303-312.

10. Kovacs M. Trees as biological indicators. Biological indicators in environmental protection. New York : Ellis Horwood, 1992. – 143 p.

VOLUMETRIC DEVELOPMENT METHOD OF MEASURING THE NEEDLES IN BIOINDICATION AIR POLLUTION

Esyakova O.A., Assoc. Prof. Siberian State Technological University, Ph.D. (Biol.); Stepen’ R.A., Prof. Siberian State Technological University, Dr. Sci. (Biol.)

olga-la83@mail.ru, stepen.rob@yandex.ru

 Siberian State Technological University, Russia, 660049, Krasnoyarsk, Mira ave., 82

The quantitative assessment of air pollutors carried out by means of bioindicator methods allows to receive more reliable and objective results. The aim of the research was to develop a method of tree needles volume measurement as a bioindicator of urban air environment pollution. The device has been developed for needles volume measurement, representing a cylinder with a piston consisting of a rod inside with an umbrella made of a waterproof close-meshed material fixed on it. Combination of mark on a rod with a water level in the cylinder before and after putting needles in the cylinder determines the volume of the studied quantity of needles. A comparison is given of the results of Siberian spruce middle part of the crown needles volume measurement conducted by the developed criterium and the morphometric one. The comparison of the obtained data shows that morphometric measurements exceed volumetric ones almost for 12 %. Such a result can be explained by the form of the needles which cannot be considered by the calculation of the samples volume by the morphometric method. The objective character of the volumetric method is also proved by the low size of a variation coefficient of measurement results. The volume of Siberian spruce needles, defined by a volumetric method, was used as the indicator of an air urban pollution environment. The example of the industrial center in Siberia shows the method of the assessment of aerogenic pollution in different Krasnoyarsk districts on the measured volume of needles carried out by a volumetric way. Specific emissions of the plants and motor transport gases were taken into account in the analysis of the measurements results. Country forest stands were investigated as sites with favorable environment. The results of the environmental pressure on the air environment assessment, received by the volumetric method, are coordinated with the data of the morphometric measurements of the similar research sites. The developed device for scoping the wrong form samples allows to receive more exact and reliable results when carrying out bioindicator researches.

Keywords: bioindication, volumetric method, Siberian spruce, anthropogenic air pollution

References

1. Esyakova O.A., Stepen’ R.A. Zonirovanie zagryazneniya atmosfery g. Krasnoyarska bioindikatsionnymi metodami [Zoning of the Krasnoyarsk’s atmosphere pollution by bioindicator methods] : Monograph. Krasnoyarsk : SibSTU, 2011. 124 p.

2. Mikhaylova T.A., eds. Kompleksnaya ekologicheskaya otsenka sostoyaniya lesov Tayshetskogo rayona pered zapuskom alyuminievogo proizvodstva v g. Tayshet [Complex ecological assessment of the woods condition in the Tayshetsky area before start of aluminum production to Taishet]. Irkutsk : Institute of geography of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Science, 2005. 159 p.

3. O sostoyanii i okhrane okruzhayushchey sredy v Krasnoyarskom krae za 2012 god [About a state and environmental protection in Krasnoyarsk Krai for 2012] : State report. Krasnoyarsk, 2013. 450 p.

4. Onuchin A.A., Kozlova L.N. Strukturno-funktsional’nye izmeneniya khvoi sosny pod vliyaniem pollyutantov v lesostepnoy zone Sredney Sibiri [Structurally functional changes of pine needles under the influence of pollutant in a forest-steppe zone of Central Siberia]. Lesovedenie [Silvics], 1993, no 2, pp. 39-42.

5. Stepen’ R.A., Esyakova O. A., Ambartsumyan O. N., Martonik E. V. Pribor dlya izmereniya ob»ema khvoi [The device for measurement of needles volume]. Patent RF, no. 89222, 2009.

6. Sokolov D.B., Sin’kevich A.L., Emel’yanova P.A. Drevesinovedenie [Wood science]. Leningrad : Leningrad technical academy Publ., 1974. 61 p.

7. Mazurkin P.M., Kolesnikova A.A. Sposob ispytaniya drevesnykh rasteniy [Way of wood plants test]. Patent RF, no. 2196327, 2003.

8. Manninen S., Huttunen S. Scots pine needles as bioindicators of sulphur deposition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 1995. Vol. 25, no 10, pp. 1559-1569.

9. Tichy J. Impact of atmospheric deposition on the status of planted Norway spruce stands: a comparative study between sites in southern Sweden and the northeastern Czech Republic. Environmental Pollution. 1996. no 3, pp. 303-312.

10. Kovacs M. Trees as biological indicators. Biological indicators in environmental protection. New York : Ellis Horwood, 1992. 143 p.

 

3

ÑÎÄÅÐÆÀÍÈÅ ÌÈÍÅÐÀËÜÍÛÕ ÝËÅÌÅÍÒÎÂ Â ÎÒÌÈÐÀÞÙÅÉ ÕÂÎÅ ÑÎÑÍÛ ÍÀ ÎÑÓØÅÍÍÛÕ ÏËÎÙÀÄßÕ

15-20

 

Å.Ï. ÕÀÁÀÐÎÂÀ, àñï. êàô. áîòàíèêè, îáùåé ýêîëîãèè è ïðèðîäîïîëüçîâàíèÿ Ñ(À)ÔÓ,

Ï.À. ÔÅÊËÈÑÒÎÂ, ïðîô. êàô. áîòàíèêè, îáùåé ýêîëîãèè è ïðèðîäîïîëüçîâàíèÿ Ñ(À)ÔÓ,

 ä-ð ñ.-õ. íàóê,

À.Å. ÊÎØÅËÅÂÀ, ñò. íàó÷íûé ñîòðóäíèê ÖÊÏ ÍÎ «Àðêòèêà» Ñ(À)ÔÓ, êàíä. õèì. íàóê

alena.khabarova2010@yandex.ru, pfeklistov@yandex.ru, kosheleva-an@yandex.ru

Ëåñîòåõíè÷åñêèé èíñòèòóò, Ñåâåðíûé (Àðêòè÷åñêèé) Ôåäåðàëüíûé Óíèâåðñèòåò èì. Ì.Â. Ëîìîíîñîâà,

 Öåíòð êîëëåêòèâíîãî ïîëüçîâàíèÿ íàó÷íûì îáîðóäîâàíèåì «Àðêòèêà»,

 Ñåâåðíûé (Àðêòè÷åñêèé) Ôåäåðàëüíûé Óíèâåðñèòåò èìåíè Ì.Â. Ëîìîíîñîâà

 163002, ã. Àðõàíãåëüñê, Íàáåðåæíàÿ Ñåâåðíîé Äâèíû, 17

Âëèÿíèå îñóøåíèÿ íà ñîäåðæàíèå ýëåìåíòîâ ìèíåðàëüíîãî ïèòàíèÿ â ðàñòóùåé è îòìèðàþùåé õâîå ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé íà Åâðîïåéñêîì Ñåâåðå èçó÷àëîñü ìàëî, ìåæäó òåì îò ñòåïåíè îáåñïå÷åííîñòè äåðåâüåâ ìèíåðàëüíûìè âåùåñòâàìè çàâèñèò èõ ðîñò. Íåâûñîêîå ñîäåðæàíèå êàêîãî-ëèáî ýëåìåíòà â õâîå ãîâîðèò î íåóäîâëåòâîðèòåëüíîì ñíàáæåíèè äåðåâüåâ ýòèì ýëåìåíòîì, à òàêæå ñîïðîâîæäàåòñÿ óãíåòåíèåì ðîñòîâûõ ïðîöåññîâ è, êàê ñëåäñòâèå, ñíèæåíèåì ïðîèçâîäèòåëüíîñòè äðåâîñòîåâ.  ñòàòüå ïðèâåäåíû ðåçóëüòàòû èçó÷åíèÿ âëèÿíèÿ îñóøåíèÿ íà ñîäåðæàíèå ìèíåðàëüíûõ ýëåìåíòîâ â îòìèðàþùåé õâîå ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé.  ðàñòóùåé è îòìèðàþùåé õâîå îïðåäåëÿëîñü ñîäåðæàíèå ñëåäóþùèõ ýëåìåíòîâ: àçîò, êàëèé, ôîñôîð, êàëüöèé, ìàãíèé, ñåðà, ìàðãàíåö, êðåìíèé, æåëåçî, àëþìèíèé, íàòðèé. Ïðåäñòàâëåíû äàííûå î èçìåíåíèè êàê ñóììàðíîãî ñîäåðæàíèÿ ìèíåðàëüíûõ ýëåìåíòîâ â îòìèðàþùåé õâîå ñîñíû, òàê è êàæäîãî ýëåìåíòà â îòäåëüíîñòè; îòìå÷åíî, êàêèå ìèíåðàëüíûå ýëåìåíòû â íàèáîëüøåé ñòåïåíè ñîäåðæàòñÿ â îòìèðàþùåé õâîå. Ïðîâåäåí ñðàâíèòåëüíûé àíàëèç ñîäåðæàíèÿ ìèíåðàëüíûõ ýëåìåíòîâ â îòìèðàþùåé è ðàñòóùåé õâîå ñîñíû, ðàññìîòðåíà òåíäåíöèÿ èçìåíåíèÿ ñîäåðæàíèÿ êàê êàæäîãî ýëåìåíòà â îòäåëüíîñòè, òàê è ñóììàðíîãî ñîäåðæàíèÿ ýëåìåíòîâ ïèòàíèÿ. Êîððåëÿöèîííûé àíàëèç ïîëó÷åííûõ äàííûõ ïîäòâåðæäàåò òåñíîòó ñâÿçè ñóììàðíîãî ñîäåðæàíèÿ ýëåìåíòîâ ìèíåðàëüíîãî ïèòàíèÿ â õâîå ñîñíû ñ ðàññòîÿíèåì îò îñóøèòåëÿ. Ïðè èçó÷åíèè òåñíîòû ñâÿçè ñîäåðæàíèÿ êàæäîãî ìèíåðàëüíîãî ýëåìåíòà â îòäåëüíîñòè ñ ðàññòîÿíèåì îò îñóøèòåëÿ ó áîëüøèíñòâà ýëåìåíòîâ ïðîñëåæèâàåòñÿ âûñîêàÿ è çíà÷èòåëüíàÿ êîððåëÿòèâíàÿ ñâÿçü. Äëÿ âûÿâëåíèÿ ôîðìû ñâÿçè ïðîâåäåí ðåãðåññèîííûé àíàëèç, êîòîðûé ïîêàçàë, ÷òî çàâèñèìîñòü ìîæíî âûðàçèòü ëèíåéíûì óðàâíåíèåì. Ïðåäñòàâëåíî ðàñïðåäåëåíèå â ïîðÿäêå óáûâàíèÿ âñåõ ìèíåðàëüíûõ ýëåìåíòîâ, ñîäåðæàíèå êîòîðûõ áûëî îïðåäåëåíî êàê â ðàñòóùåé, òàê è â îòìèðàþùåé õâîå ñîñíû.

Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: îòìèðàþùàÿ õâîÿ, ðàñòóùàÿ õâîÿ, ñòåïåíü îñóøåíèÿ, ìèíåðàëüíûå ýëåìåíòû, ìåæêàíàëüíîå ïðîñòðàíñòâî, êðóãîâîðîò âåùåñòâ.

Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê

1. Áîáêîâà, Ê.Ñ. Áèîëîãè÷åñêàÿ ïðîäóêòèâíîñòü õâîéíûõ ëåñîâ Åâðîïåéñêîãî Ñåâåðî-Âîñòîêà / Ê.Ñ. Áîáêîâà. – Ë.: Íàóêà, 1987. – 156 ñ.

2. Âîìïåðñêèé, Ñ.Ý. Áèîëîãè÷åñêèå îñíîâû ýôôåêòèâíîñòè ëåñîîñóøåíèÿ / Ñ.Ý. Âîìïåðñêèé. – Ì.: Íàóêà, 1968. – 312 ñ.

3. Êàçèìèðîâ, Í.È. Áèîëîãè÷åñêèé êðóãîâîðîò âåùåñòâ â åëüíèêàõ Êàðåëèè / Í.È. Êàçèìèðîâ, Ð.Ì. Ìîðîçîâà. – Ë.:Íàóêà, 1973. – 175 ñ.

4. Êàçèìèðîâ, Í.È. Îáìåí âåùåñòâ è ýíåðãèè â ñîñíîâûõ ëåñàõ Åâðîïåéñêîãî Ñåâåðà / Í.È. Êàçèìèðîâ,

 À.Ä. Âîëêîâ, Ñ.Ñ. Çÿá÷åíêî, À.À. Èâàí÷èêîâ, Ð.Ì. Ìîðîçîâà. – Ë.: Íàóêà, 1977. – 304 ñ.

5. Êîíîâàëîâ, Â.Í. Ýêîëîãî-ôèçèîëîãè÷åñêèå îñîáåííîñòè õâîéíûõ íà îñóøàåìûõ çåìëÿõ / Â.Í. Êîíîâàëîâ, Ë.Â. Çàðóáèíà. – Àðõàíãåëüñê: ÑÀÔÓ, 2010. – 295 ñ.

6. Ëèð, Õ. Ôèçèîëîãèÿ äðåâåñíûõ ðàñòåíèé / Ëèð Õ., Ïîëüñòåð Ã., Ôèäëåð Ã.. – Ì.: Ëåñíàÿ ïðîì-ñòü, 1974. – 424 ñ.

7. Òþêàâèíà, Î.Í. Èçìåíåíèå àññèìèëÿöèîííîãî àïïàðàòà, âîäíîãî ðåæèìà è ñòðóêòóðû ãîäè÷íîãî êîëüöà ñîñíû ïîä âëèÿíèåì îñóøåíèÿ: äèññ. ... êàíä. ñ.-õ. íàóê / Î.Í. Òþêàâèíà. – Àðõàíãåëüñê, 2003. – 20 ñ.

8. Ôåêëèñòîâ, Ï.À. Èçìåíåíèå ýêîëîãè÷åñêèõ óñëîâèé è ðîñò ñåâåðîòàåæíûõ ñîñíÿêîâ ïîñëå îñóøåíèÿ / Ï.À. Ôåêëèñòîâ, Â.Í. Åâäîêèìîâ, Â.Â. Õóäÿêîâ. – Àðõàíãåëüñê: ÀÃÒÓ, 1995. – 52 ñ.

9. Ôåêëèñòîâ, Ï.À. Áèîëîãè÷åñêèå è ýêîëîãè÷åñêèå îñîáåííîñòè ðîñòà ñîñíû â ñåâåðíîé ïîäçîíå Åâðîïåéñêîé òàéãè / Ï.À. Ôåêëèñòîâ, Â.Í. Åâäîêèìîâ, Â.Ì. Áàðçóò – Àðõàíãåëüñê: ÀÃÒÓ, 1997. – 140 ñ.

10. Õàáàðîâà, Å.Ï. Âëèÿíèå îñóøåíèÿ íà ñîäåðæàíèå ìèíåðàëüíûõ ýëåìåíòîâ â õâîå äåðåâüåâ ñîñíû / Å.Ï. Õàáàðîâà, Ï.À. Ôåêëèñòîâ, À.Å. Êîøåëåâà // Âåñòíèê ÑÀÔÓ, 2013. – ¹ 3. – Ñ. 101–108.

 

CONTENTS OF MINERAL ELEMENTS IN the Dying OFF NEEDLES OF SCOTCH PINE ON DRAINED AREAS

Habarova E.P., gr. NArFU, Timber institute; Feklistov P.A., Prof. NArFU, Dr.Sci (Agricultural); Kosheleva A.E., Senior Researcher, Center of collective using scientific equipment «Arctic», NArFU, Ph.D (Chemistry)

alena.khabarova2010@yandex.ru, pfeklistov@yandex.ru, kosheleva-an@yandex.ru

 Northern (Arctic) Federal University of M.V. Lomonosov, 163002, Arkhangelsk, Severnaya Dvina Embankment, 17

There has not been enough research on the influence of the draining on the content of mineral nutrition in the growing and dying off needles of the Scotch pine in the North of Europe. Meanwhile, the needles growth depends on the mineral elements supply of the trees. The low content of a mineral element in the needles shows poor supply of the trees with this element and is also accompanied with the suppression of growing processes and, as a consequence, with the decrease in forest productivity. The article represents the research results of draining influence on mineral elements content in the dying off needles of Scotch pine. The growing and dying off needles were checked for the content of the following elements: nitrogen, potassium, phosphorus, calcium, magnesium, sulfur, manganese, silicon, iron, aluminum, sodium. The article offers data on changing both the content of mineral elements in the dying off needles in summary and of every single element; on what mineral elements are held in dying off needles. A comparative analysis of the mineral elements content in dying off and growing needles has been carried out, the trend of nutrition element changes for both every single element and all of them in summary has been calculated. The correlation analysis of the obtained data proves the correlation between the summary content of mineral elements in pine needles and the distance to the dehydrator. Learning the correlation ratio of every single element content and distance from dehydrator shows strong and significant correlation. Regression analysis has been performed to determine the correlation type, it showed that the correlation can be expressed by a linear equation. The distribution in the descending order of all mineral elements the content of which was determined both in growing and dying off pine needles is given in the article.

Keywords: die off needles, growing needles, draining degree, mineral elements, intercanal space, circulation of elements.

 

References

1. Bobkova K.S. Biologicheskaya productivnost’ khvoinykh lesov Yevropeyskogo Severo-Vostoka [Biological efficiency of coniferous forests of the European Northeast]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1987. 156 p.

2. Vomperskiy S.E. Biologicheskiye osnovy effektivnosti lesoosuscheniya [Biological bases of efficiency of forest melioration]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1968. 312 p.

3. Kazimirov N.I., Morozova R.M. Biologicheskiy krugovorot veshchestv v el’nikakh Karelii [Biological circulation of substances in fir groves of Karelia]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1973. 175 p.

4. Kazimirov N.I.,Volkov A.D., Zyabchenko S.S., Ivanchikov A.A. Obmen veshch i energii v sosnovykh lesakh Yevropeyskogo Severa [Metabolism and energy in the pine woods of the European North]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1977. 304 p.

5. Konovalov V.N., Zarubina L.V. Ekologo-fiziologicheskiye osobennosti khvoinykh na osuschaemykh zemlyakh [Ekologo-fiziologichesky features coniferous on the drained lands]. Arkhangel’sk.:SAFU Publ., 2010. 295 p.

6. Lir Kh., Pol’ster G., Fidler G. Fisiologiya drevesnykh rastenii [Physiology of wood plants]. – Moscow: Forest industry Publ., 1974. 424 p.

7. Tyukavina O.N. Izmeneniye assimilyatsionnogo apparata, vodnogo rezhima I struktury godichnogo kol’tsa sosny pod vliyaniem osuscheniya. Avtoref. Diss. kand. s-kh .nauk [Change of the assimilatory device, the water mode and structure of a year ring of a pine under the influence of drainage. Autoabstract of dr. agric. sci. diss]. 06.03.02. Arkhangel’sk: 2003. 20 p.

8. Feklistov P.A., Evdokimov V.N., Khudyakov V.V. Izmeneniye ekologicheskikh usloviy I rost severotayozhnykh sosnyakov posle osuscheniya [Change of ecological conditions and growth of North taiga pine forests after drainage]. Arkhangel’sk: AGTU Publ., 1995. 52 p.

9. Feklistov P.A., Evdokimov V.N., Barzut V.M. Biologicheskiye i ekologicheskiye osobennosti rosta sosny v severnoi podzone evropeyskoy taygi [Biological and ecological features of growth of a pine in a northern subband of the European taiga]. Arkhangel’sk: IPTS AGTU Publ., 1997. 140 p.

10. Khabarova E.P., Feklistov P.A., Koscheleva A.E. Vliyaniye osuscheniya na soderzhaniye mineral’nykh elementov v khvoe derev’ev sosny [Influence of drainage on the maintenance of mineral elements in needles of trees of a pine]. Vestnik SAFU [Bulletin NArFU]. 2013. no. 3, pp. 101-108.

 

4

ÏÎ×ÂÅÍÍÀß ÏÐÈÓÐÎ×ÅÍÍÎÑÒÜ ÏÐÎÈÇÐÀÑÒÀÍÈß ÐÅÄÊÈÕ ÐÀÑÒÅÍÈÉ Â ÏÈÍÅÆÑÊÎÌ ÃÎÑÓÄÀÐÑÒÂÅÍÍÎÌ ÇÀÏÎÂÅÄÍÈÊÅ

21-27

 

Å.Í. ÍÀÊÂÀÑÈÍÀ, ïðîô. êàô. ëåñîâîäñòâà è ïî÷âîâåäåíèÿ Ëåñîòåõíè÷åñêîãî èíñòèòóòà Ñ(À)ÔÓ, ä-ð ñ.-õ. íàóê,

Ë.Â. ÏÓ×ÍÈÍÀ, çàì. äèðåêòîðà Ãîñóäàðñòâåííîãî çàïîâåäíèêà «Ïèíåæñêèé»,

À.Â. ÂÀÑÈËÜÅÂ, Ñ(À)ÔÓ

nakvasina@yandex.ru, pinzapno@mail.ru

Ëåñîòåõíè÷åñêèé èíñòèòóò Ñåâåðíîãî (Àðêòè÷åñêîãî) ôåäåðàëüíîãî óíèâåðñèòåòà èì. Ì.Â. Ëîìîíîñîâà

 163002, ã. Àðõàíãåëüñê, Íàá. Ñåâ. Äâèíû, 17,

 ÔÃÁÓ « Ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé çàïîâåäíèê «Ïèíåæñêèé»»

 164610, Àðõàíãåëüñêàÿ îáë, Ïèíåæñêèé ð-í, ï. Ïèíåãà, óë. Ïåðâîìàéñêàÿ, 123À

Èçó÷åíà ïî÷âåííàÿ ïðèóðî÷åííîñòü ðåäêèõ ðàñòåíèé (Âåíåðèí áàøìà÷îê íàñòîÿùèé, Êàëèïñî ëóêîâè÷íîå, Ïèîí óêëîíÿþùèéñÿ–Ìàðüèí êîðåíü è Ïàëü÷àòîêîðåííèê Òðàóíøòåéíåðà), âñòðå÷àþùèõñÿ â Ïèíåæñêîì ãîñóäàðñòâåííîì çàïîâåäíèêå. Èññëåäîâàíèÿ ïðîâîäèëèñü â 2009 ã. íà 30 ñòàöèîíàðíûõ ïëîùàäêàõ ñèñòåìàòè÷åñêèõ íàáëþäåíèé. Óñòàíîâëåíî, ÷òî ïèîí è êàëèïñî ïðåäïî÷èòàþò õîðîøî äðåíèðîâàííûå àëëþâèàëüíûå äåðíîâûå ïî÷âû ñ îòíîñèòåëüíî ìîùíûì äåðíîâûì ãîðèçîíòîì, ðàçâèâàþùèåñÿ ïîä ðàçíûìè òèïàìè ëåñà. Êàëèïñî, â îòëè÷èå îò ïèîíà, ëåã÷å âûäåðæèâàåò ïîâåðõíîñòíîå çàáîëà÷èâàíèå áëàãîäàðÿ êëóáíåâîé ôîðìå êîðíåâèùà è ìîæåò âñòðå÷àòüñÿ íà çàáîëî÷åííûõ ïî÷âàõ â ïîéìåííûõ åëüíèêàõ. Âåíåðèí áàøìà÷îê èìååò áîëåå øèðîêèé ñïåêòð óñëîâèé ïðîèçðàñòàíèÿ. Îí ìîæåò âñòðå÷àòüñÿ â ëåñàõ ñ ðàçëè÷íûì ñîñòàâîì äðåâîñòîÿ, íî ïðåäïî÷èòàåò åëüíèêè ñ ðàçíîòðàâíûì íàïî÷âåííûì ïîêðîâîì íà ïîéìåííûõ àëëþâèàëüíûõ äåðíîâûõ ïðèìèòèâíûõ èëè äåðíîâî-êàðáîíàòíûõ ìàëîìîùíûõ ïî÷âàõ ñ ëåãêèì ãðàíóëîìåòðè÷åñêèì ñîñòàâîì, îòëè÷àþùèõñÿ õîðîøåé äðåíèðîâàííîñòüþ. Åãî òàêæå ìîæíî âñòðåòèòü è íà ñêëîíîâûõ ïî÷âàõ, ïî áåðåãàì îçåð íà òîðôÿíîé ïåðåõîäíîé (âåðõîâîé) ïî÷âå ñ âûñîêèì óðîâíåì ãðóíòîâûõ âîä. Âñå òðè ðåäêèõ âèäà ðàñòóò íà ìèíåðàëèçîâàííûõ íåéòðàëüíûõ èëè ñëàáîùåëî÷íûõ ïî÷âàõ, ðàçâèâàþùèõñÿ íà êàðáîíàòíûõ îòëîæåíèÿõ.  òî æå âðåìÿ Ïàëü÷àòîêîðåííèê ïðèóðî÷åí ê áîëåå êèñëûì ïî÷âàì ñ ðåàêöèåé ñðåäû îò íåéòðàëüíîé äî ñëàáîêèñëîé. Îí âñòðå÷àåòñÿ â ñîñíÿêàõ íà çàáîëî÷åííûõ áåðåãàõ îçåð ñ êëþ÷åâûì âîäíûì ïèòàíèåì è íà êëþ÷åâûõ îñîêîâî-ãèïíîâûõ áîëîòàõ ñ òîðôÿíûìè âåðõîâûìè ñëàáîìèíåðàëèçîâàííûìè ïî÷âàìè.

Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ðåäêèå ðàñòåíèÿ, ïî÷âû, êàðáîíàòíûå îòëîæåíèÿ

Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê

1. Çàõàð÷åíêî, Þ.Â., Ïèíåæñêèé çàïîâåäíèê / Þ.Â. Çàõàð÷åíêî. – Àðõàíãåëüñê, 1996. – 25 ñ.

2. Ãîðÿ÷êèí, Ñ.Â. Ãåíåçèñ, ýâîëþöèÿ è äèíàìèêà ïî÷âåííî-ãåîìîðôîëîãè÷åñêèõ ñèñòåì êàðñòîâûõ ëàíäøàôòîâ åâðîïåéñêîãî Ñåâåðà / Ñ.Â. Ãîðÿ÷êèí, Å. Øàâðèíà // Ïî÷âîâåäåíèå – 1999. – ¹ 10. – Ñ. 1173–1185.

3. Ïó÷íèíà, Ë.Â.Ñòðóêòóðà è äèíàìèêà ïðèðîäíûõ êîìïîíåíòîâ Ïèíåæñêîãî çàïîâåäíèêà / Ë.Â. Ïó÷íèíà – Àðõàíãåëüñê, 2000. – 267 ñ.

4. Ãîðÿ÷êèí, Ñ.Â. Ïî÷âåííûé ïîêðîâ / Ñ.Â. Ãîðÿ÷êèí // Ñòðóêòóðà è äèíàìèêà ïðèðîäíûõ êîìïîíåíòîâ Ïèíåæñêîãî çàïîâåäíèêà (Ñåâåðíàÿ òàéãà ÅÒÐ, Àðõàíãåëüñêàÿ îáëàñòü). – Àðõàíãåëüñê, 2000. – Ñ. 56–64.

5. Ãîðÿ÷êèí, Ñ.Â. Ïî÷âåííàÿ êàðòà Ïèíåæñêîãî ãîñóäàðñòâåííîãî çàïîâåäíèêà. Îáúÿñíèòåëüíàÿ çàïèñêà ê êàðòå è ëåãåíäå ê íåé / Ñ.Â. Ãîðÿ÷êèí. – Ì., 1989. – 128ñ.

6. Êðàñíàÿ êíèãà Àðõàíãåëüñêîé îáëàñòè /Àäìèíèñòðàöèÿ Àðõàíã. oáë. – Àðõàíãåëüñê: Êîì. ïî ýêîëîãèè Àðõàíã. îáë., 2008. – 351 ñ.

7. ×åðåïàíîâ, Ñ.Ê. Ñîñóäèñòûå ðàñòåíèÿ Ðîññèè è ñîïðåäåëüíûõ ãîñóäàðñòâ / Ñ.Ê. ×åðåïàíîâ. – ÑÏá., 1995. – 990 ñ.

8. Íàêâàñèíà, Å.Í. Ïîëåâîé ïðàêòèêóì ïî ïî÷âîâåäåíèþ / Å.Í. Íàêâàñèíà, Â.Ñ. Ñåðûé, Á.À. Ñåìåíîâ. – Àðõàíãåëüñê: ÀÃÒÓ, 2007. – 127 ñ.

9. Àãðîõèìè÷åñêèå ñâîéñòâà ïî÷â: ó÷åá. ïîñîáèå / Å.Í. Íàêâàñèíà. – Àðõàíãåëüñê: ÀÃÒÓ, 2009. – 101 ñ.

10. ÃÎÑÒ 27784-88. Ïî÷âû. Ìåòîä îïðåäåëåíèÿ çîëüíîñòè òîðôÿíûõ è îòîðôîâàííûõ ãîðèçîíòîâ ïî÷â. – Ì.: Ãîñ. êîìèòåò ïî ñòàíäàðòàì, 1988. – 7 ñ.

11. ÃÎÑÒ 26423-85. Ïî÷âû. Ìåòîäû îïðåäåëåíèÿ óäåëüíîé ýëåêòðè÷åñêîé ïðîâîäèìîñòè, ðÍ è ïëîòíîãî îñòàòêà âîäíîé âûòÿæêè. – Ì.: Ãîñ. êîìèòåò ïî ñòàíäàðòàì, 1988. – 10 ñ.

SOIL TIMED OF RARE PLANT GROWING IN the PINEZHSKY STATE RESERVE

Nakvasina E.N., Prof. NArFU, Dr.Sci. (Agricultural); Puchnina L.V., Pinezhsky State Reserve; Vasil’ev A.V., NArFU

nakvasina@yandex.ru, pinzapno@mail.ru

 Forest Engineering Institute, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named by M.V. Lomonosov, 163002, Arkhangelsk, st. Naberegnaia Sev.Dviny, 17

 Pinezhsky State Reserve, 164610, Arkhangelsk region, Pinezhsky district, p. Pinyega, st. Pervomayskaya, 123A

The soil timed of rare plants (Cypripedium calceolus L., Calypso bulbosa (L.) Reichb., Paeonia anomala L. and Orchis traunsteineri Saut. Ex Reichb.), found in Pinezhsky State Reserve, has been studied. The research was conducted in 2009 at 30 fixed areas of systematic observations. It was established that Paeonia anomala and Calypso bulbosa grow on well-drained alluvial sod soils with relatively powerful sod horizon, developing at different forest types. Calypso bulbosa, unlike Paeonia anomala, can better withstand surface waterlogging due to the tuberous rhizomes form and may be found in the waterlogged soils of the floodplain spruce forests. Cypripedium calceolus has a wider range of growing conditions. It can be found in forests with different stand composition, but prefers spruce with forb ground cover on floodplain alluvial sod and primitive or calcareous soils with low-power light grain texture and good drainage. It can also be seen on the sloping soils of the lake shores, peat transition (horse) soil with high groundwater levels. At the same time, Orchis traunsteineri grows on more acidic soils with the medium reaction from neutral to weak acidity. It can be found in pine forests on the swampy shores of the lakes with key water supply and on the key sedge peat bogs on peat upland weak-mineralized soils.

Keywords: rare plants, soil, carbonate deposits

References

1. Pinezhskiy zapovednik [Pinezhsky Reserve]. Arkhangel’sk, 1996. 25 p.

2. Goryachkin S.V., Shavrina E.V. Genezis, evolyutsiya i dinamika pochvenno-geomorfologicheskikh sistem karstovykh landshaftov evropeyskogo Severa [Genesis, evolution and dynamics of soil-geomorphic systems karst landscape of Northern European]. Pochvovedenie [Journal of Soil Science]. 1999. ¹ 10. pp. 1173-185.

3. Struktura i dinamika prirodnykh komponentov Pinezhskogo zapovednika [Structure and dynamics of natural ingredients Pinezhsky Reserve]. Arkhangel’sk, 2000. 267 p.

4. Goryachkin, S.V. Pochvennyy pokrov. Struktura i dinamika prirodnykh komponentov Pinezhskogo zapovednika (severnaya tayga ETR, Arkhangel’skaya oblast’) [Soil cover. Structure and dynamics of natural ingredients Pinezhsky Reserve (northern taiga ETP, Arkhangelsk region)]. Arkhangel’sk, 2000. pp.56-64.

5. Goryachkin, S.V. Pochvennaya karta Pinezhskogo gosudarstvennogo zapovednika Ob”yasnitel’naya zapiska k karte i legende k ney [Soil map Pinezhsky State Reserve. Explanatory note to the map and legend to her.]. Moscow, 1989. 128 p.

6. Krasnaya kniga Arkhangel’skoy oblasti [The Red Book of the Arkhangelsk Region]. – Arkhangel’sk: The Environmental Committee of the Arkhangelsk Region, 2008. 351 p.

7. Cherepanov, S.K. Sosudistye rasteniya Rossii i sopredel’nykh gosudarstv [Vascular plants of Russia and Neighboring Countries]. Saint Petersburg, 1995. 990 p.

8. Polevoy praktikum po pochvovedeniyu [Field Workshop on Soil]. Arkhangel’sk: Arkhangelsk State Technical University, 2007. 127 p.

9. Agrokhimicheskie svoystva pochv: ucheb. posobie [Agrochemical properties of soils: proc. allowance]. Arkhangel’sk: Arkhangelsk State Technical University, 2009. 101p.

10. GOST 27784-88. Pochvy. Metod opredeleniya zol’nosti torfyanykh i otorfovannykh gorizontov pochv [GOST 27784. soils. Method for determination of ash content of peat and peaty soil horizons.]. Moscow: State Committee on Standards, 1988. 7 p.

11. GOST 26423-85. Pochvy. Metody opredeleniya udel’noy elektricheskoy provodimosti, pH i plotnogo ostatka vodnoy vytyazhki [GOST 26423. Soils. Methods for determination of specific electric conductivity, ðÍ and solid residue of water extract]. Moscow: State Committee on Standards, 1988. 10 p.

 

5

ÑÎÑÒÀ ÎÐÃÀÍÈ×ÅÑÊÎÃÎ ÂÅÙÅÑÒÂÀ È ÅÃÎ ÇÀÏÀÑÛ Â ÏÎ×ÂÀÕ ÊÀÐÅËÈÈ, ÑÔÎÐÌÈÐÎÂÀÂØÈÕÑß ÍÀ ÊÎÐÅÍÍÛÕ ÏÎÐÎÄÀÕ

28-33

 

Î.Í. ÁÀÕÌÅÒ, äîö., ëàáîðàòîðèÿ ëåñíîãî ïî÷âîâåäåíèÿ Èíñòèòóò ëåñà ÊàðÍÖ ÐÀÍ,

 êàíä. áèîë. íàóê

obahmet@mail.ru

ÔÃÁÓÍ Êàðåëüñêèé íàó÷íûé öåíòð Ðîññèéñêîé àêàäåìèè íàóê

 185910, Ðåñïóáëèêà Êàðåëèÿ, ã. Ïåòðîçàâîäñê, óë. Ïóøêèíñêàÿ, 11

Ïðîâåäåíû èññëåäîâàíèÿ î