|
Íàçâàíèå
æóðíàëà
|
Âåñòíèê
Ìîñêîâñêîãî ãîñóäàðñòâåííîãî óíèâåðñèòåòà ëåñà Ëåñíîé âåñòíèê
|
|
ISSN/Êîä
ÍÝÁ
|
1727-3749
/ 17273749
|
Äàòà
|
2014/2014
|
|
Òîì
|
18
|
Âûïóñê
|
5
|
|
Ñòðàíèöû
|
6-206
|
Âñåãî
ñòàòåé
|
31
|
|
ÄÅÍÄÐÎ 2012: ÏÅÐÑÏÅÊÒÈÂÛ ÏÐÈÌÅÍÅÍÈß ÄÐÅÂÅÑÍÎ-ÊÎËÜÖÅÂÎÉ ÈÍÔÎÐÌÀÖÈÈ ÄËß
ÖÅËÅÉ ÎÕÐÀÍÛ, ÂÎÑÏÐÎÈÇÂÎÄÑÒÂÀ È ÐÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÎÃÎ ÈÑÏÎËÜÇÎÂÀÍÈß ÄÐÅÂÅÑÍÎÉ
ÐÀÑÒÈÒÅËÜÍÎÑÒÈ
|
|
1
|
ÁÈÎÈÍÄÈÊÀÖÈß ÑÎÑÒÎßÍÈß ÎÊÐÓÆÀÞÙÅÉ ÑÐÅÄÛ ÏÎ
ÎÒÍÎÑÈÒÅËÜÍÛÌ ÏÎÊÀÇÀÒÅËßÌ ÔËÓÎÐÅÑÖÅÍÖÈÈ ÕËÎÐÎÔÈËËÀ
|
6-9
|
|
Ä.Í. ÀÍÄÐÅÅÂ, çàâ. ëàáîðàòîðèåé ýêîëîãèè è îõðàíû
ïðèðîäû Ïåðìñêèé ÃÍÈÓ, êàíä. ãåîãð. íàóê
andreev@psu.ru
Ïåðìñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé
íàöèîíàëüíûé èññëåäîâàòåëüñêèé óíèâåðñèòåò
614990, ã. Ïåðìü, óë. Áóêèðåâà, 15
Âûïîëíåíà áèîèíäèêàöèÿ ñîñòîÿíèÿ ïðèðîäíîé
ñðåäû íà äâóõ îñîáî îõðàíÿåìûõ ïðèðîäíûõ òåððèòîðèÿõ. Èññëåäîâàëèñü ýêîñèñòåìû
ñîñíîâûõ ëåñîâ â ãîðîäå Ïåðìè è íà ôîíîâîé òåððèòîðèè. Èññëåäîâàíèÿ ïðîâîäèëèñü
ñîãëàñíî «Ìåòîäèêå ðåãèñòðàöèè çàìåäëåííîé ôëóîðåñöåíöèè õëîðîôèëëà ïðè
áèîèíäèêàöèè çàãðÿçíåíèÿ âîçäóøíîé ñðåäû íà õâîéíûõ». Íà äâóõ ïëîùàäêàõ
èçìåðÿëàñü ñóòî÷íàÿ äèíàìèêà èçìåíåíèÿ çàìåäëåííîé ôëóîðåñöåíöèè íà èññëåäóåìûõ
òåððèòîðèÿõ â çàâèñèìîñòè îò òåìïåðàòóðû è âëàæíîñòè âîçäóõà. Â ðåçóëüòàòå
ñîñòàâëåíû ãðàôèêè äíåâíîãî èçìåíåíèÿ ïàðàìåòðîâ ôîòîñèíòåçà àññèìèëÿöèîííûõ
îðãàíîâ ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé íà òåððèòîðèÿõ ñ ðàçíûì óðîâíåì àíòðîïîãåííîãî
âîçäåéñòâèÿ. Ïîëó÷åííûå ôîíîâûå äàííûå ñòàëè îñíîâîé äëÿ ïîäðîáíîãî
èññëåäîâàíèÿ ôóíêöèîíàëüíîãî ñîñòîÿíèÿ ñîñíîâûõ ýêîñèñòåì íà îñîáî îõðàíÿåìîé
ïðèðîäíîé òåððèòîðèè «×åðíÿåâñêèé ëåñ», ðàñïîëîæåííîé ïðàêòè÷åñêè â öåíòðå
ãîðîäà Ïåðìè. Ïî ðåçóëüòàòàì èññëåäîâàíèÿ ñäåëàí âûâîä, ÷òî çíà÷åíèå
çàìåäëåííîé ôëóîðåñöåíöèè â óñëîâèÿõ ñóùåñòâåííîé àíòðîïîãåííîé íàãðóçêè íèæå
íà 25% è áîëåå îòíîñèòåëüíî ôîíà. Òàêîå îòêëîíåíèå
ïîêàçàòåëÿ ñâèäåòåëüñòâóåò îá àíòðîïîãåííîì âîçäåéñòâèè äàæå íà ðàííåé
ñòàäèè äåãðàäàöèè ýêîñèñòåì. Äîïîëíèòåëüíî ïðîâåäåíî ãåîõèìè÷åñêîå
èññëåäîâàíèå. Ïî åãî ðåçóëüòàòàì âûÿâëåíû ðàçëè÷èÿ ïîêàçàòåëÿ êà÷åñòâà ïî÷â è
õâîè ìîäåëüíûõ òåððèòîðèé.  ïî÷âàõ ëåãêîãî ìåõàíè÷åñêîãî ñîñòàâà ×åðíÿåâñêîãî
ëåñà âûÿâëåíî ïðåâûøåíèå ñîäåðæàíèÿ ðÿäà ìèêðîýëåìåíòîâ. Ïî ðåçóëüòàòàì
áèîèíäèêàöèè äëÿ èññëåäóåìûõ òåððèòîðèé ñîñòàâëåíû ïðîãðàììû ýêîëîãè÷åñêîãî
ìîíèòîðèíãà. Ïîìèìî ýòîãî, ïðåäëîæåíû ïðèðîäîîõðàííûå ìåðîïðèÿòèÿ, êîòîðûå
ïîçâîëÿò îïòèìèçèðîâàòü ñîñòîÿíèå îõðàíÿåìûõ òåððèòîðèé.
Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ïðèðîäíàÿ ñðåäà,
çàãðÿçíåíèå, ôëóîðåñöåíöèÿ õëîðîôèëëà, ñîñíà îáûêíîâåííàÿ, áèîèíäèêàöèÿ
Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê
1. Áóçìàêîâ, Ñ.À. Àíòðîïîãåííàÿ
òðàíñôîðìàöèÿ ïðèðîäíîé ñðåäû / Ñ.À. Áóçìàêîâ // Ãåîãðàôè÷åñêèé âåñòíèê. Ïåðìü,
2012. – ¹4 (32). – Ñ. 46–50.
2. Áóçìàêîâ, Ñ.À. Ìåòîäè÷åñêèå óêàçàíèÿ:
«Ýêîëîãè÷åñêàÿ îöåíêà ñîñòîÿíèÿ îñîáî îõðàíÿåìûõ ïðèðîäíûõ òåððèòîðèé
ðåãèîíàëüíîãî çíà÷åíèÿ» / Ñ.À. Áóçìàêîâ, Ñ.À. Îâåñíîâ, À.È. Øåïåëü, À.À. Çàéöåâ
// Ãåîãðàôè÷åñêèé âåñòíèê, 2011. – Âûï.2. – Ñ. 49–59.
3. Ãàòèíà, Å.Ë. Àíòðîïîãåííàÿ
òðàíñôîðìàöèÿ áîòàíè÷åñêîãî ðàçíîîáðàçèÿ íà òåððèòîðèè Ïåðìñêîãî êðàÿ / Å.Ë.
Ãàòèíà // Ïðîáëåìû ðåãèîíàëüíîé ýêîëîãèè, 2009. – ¹ 5. – Ñ. 160–165.
4. Áèîëîãè÷åñêèé êîíòðîëü îêðóæàþùåé
ñðåäû: áèîèíäèêàöèÿ è áèîòåñòèðîâàíèå: ó÷åá. ïîñîáèå äëÿ ñòóä. âûñø. ó÷åá.
çàâåäåíèé / ïîä ðåä. Î.Ï. Ìåëåõîâîé è Å.È. Ñàðàïóëüöåâîé. – 3-å èçä., ñòåð. –
Ì.: Èçäàòåëüñêèé öåíòð «Àêàäåìèÿ», 2010. – 288 ñ.
5. Ãðèãîðüåâ, Þ.Ñ. Ê âîïðîñó î ìåòîäèêå
ðåãèñòðàöèè çàìåäëåííîé ôëóîðåñöåíöèè õëîðîôèëëà ïðè áèîèíäèêàöèè çàãðÿçíåíèÿ
âîçäóøíîé ñðåäû íà õâîéíûõ / Þ.Ñ. Ãðèãîðüåâ, Ä.Í. Àíäðååâ // Åñòåñòâåííûå
íàóêè, 2012. – ¹ 2 (39). – Ñ. 36–39.
6. Øóáåðò, Ð. Âîçìîæíîñòè ïðèìåíåíèÿ
ðàñòèòåëüíûõ èíäèêàòîðîâ â áèîëîãî-òåõíè÷åñêîé ñèñòåìå êîíòðîëÿ îêðóæàþùåé
ïðèðîäíîé ñðåäû / Ð. Øóáåðò // Ïðîáëåìû ôîíîâîãî ìîíèòîðèíãà ñîñòîÿíèÿ
ïðèðîäíîé ñðåäû: ñá.ñò. – Ë.: ÃÌÈ, 1982. – Âûï. 1. – Ñ. 104–111.
7. Àíäðååâ, Ä.Í. Áèîèíäèêàöèÿ çàãðÿçíåíèÿ
âîçäóøíîé ñðåäû ïî çàìåäëåííîé ôëóîðåñöåíöèè õëîðîôèëëà ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé /
Ä.Í. Àíäðååâ // Åñòåñòâåííûå íàóêè, 2013. – ¹ 4 (45). – Ñ. 48–51.
8. Ãðèãîðüåâ, Þ.Ñ. Ôëóîðåñöåíöèÿ
õëîðîôèëëà â áèîèíäèêàöèè çàãðÿçíåíèÿ âîçäóøíîé ñðåäû / Þ.Ñ. Ãðèãîðüåâ //
Âåñòíèê Ìåæäóíàðîäíîé àêàäåìèè íàóê ýêîëîãèè è áåçîïàñíîñòè æèçíåäåÿòåëüíîñòè
(ÌÀÍÝÁ). – 2005. – Ò. 10. – ¹4. – Ñ. 77–91.
9. Ðóáèí, À.Á. Áèîôèçè÷åñêèå ìåòîäû â
ýêîëîãè÷åñêîì ìîíèòîðèíãå / À.Á. Ðóáèí // Ñîðîñîâñêèé îáðàçîâàòåëüíûé æóðíàë. –
2000. – ¹4. – Ñ. 7–13.
10. Àíäðååâ, Ä.Í. Ýêîãåîõèìè÷åñêàÿ
èíäèêàöèÿ àíòðîïîãåííîé òðàíñôîðìàöèè ñîñíîâûõ ýêîñèñòåì / Ä.Í. Àíäðååâ //
Russian journal of Earth Sciences. – ¹ 10(10). – 2012. – Ñ. 44–45.
BIOINDICATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS accoringtoRELATIVE INDICATORS OF CHLOROPHYLL
FLUORESCENCE
Andreev
D.N., Head of
the laboratory of ecology and nature protection, Perm State National Research
University
andreev@psu.ru
Perm State National Research University, 614990, Perm, Bukireva str., 15
Development
of a new sampling measuring method of forest estimation is associated with
necessity to replace outdated materials of forestry management and getting the
real picture of the quantitative and qualitative state of forest resources in
the specific objects with minimum material and money costs. The article
describes the development of effective and inexpensive method based on the use
of earth remote sensing and selection method of forest estimation allowing to
determine the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the plants, to
design measures for protection and reproduction of forests and prepare various
thematic maps of timber lands. On the fist stages of development and
implementation of the proposed method, the accuracy of the volume
determination, as the basic valuation measure, can be focused on the accuracy
of recommended forest management instruction for the second category of forest
resource management works, with certain correcting of the forest resource
specificity in the site. The following accuracy of volume determination is
recommended from 10 % in coniferous strata up to 30 % in aspen young growths.
An extremely important issue that is to be solved when applying the statistical
sampling methods of forest inventory operations is the determination of the
sampling volume (number of sampling units). When determining the number of
units it is necessary to take into account the fact that the allocated
homogeneous forest area (stratum) will consist of different, often discrepant
parts. Cost certification for performance of work according to the proposed
method of forest estimation shows the possibility of its application with high
economic efficiency. Thus, when the area of the object is 1 million hectare,
the necessity to include sampling units in the range of 550-600 pieces, the
cost of work in terms of 1 hectare will be about 30-35 rub/ha.
Key
words: remote sensing, plotless survey, strata, volume
References
1. Buzmakov
S.A. Antropogennaya
transformatsiya prirodnoy sredy [Anthropogenic
transformation of the natural environment] Geograficheskiy vestnik. Perm’,
2012. ¹ 4 (32). pp. 46-50.
2. Buzmakov
S.A.. Ovesnov S.A., Shepel’ A.I., Zaytsev A.A. Metodicheskie ukazaniya:
«Ekologicheskaya otsenka sostoyaniya osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territoriy
regional’nogo znacheniya»[Guidelines: “Environmental assessment of the
protected areas of regional significance”] Geograficheskiy vestnik. Perm’,
2011. V. 2. pp. 49-59.
3. Gatina
E.L. Antropogennaya
transformatsiya botanicheskogo raznoobraziya na territorii Permskogo kraya [Anthropogenic transformation of
botanical diversity in the Perm region] Problemy regional’noy ekologii ¹5,
2009. pp.160-165.
4. Biologicheskiy
kontrol’ okruzhayushchey sredy: bioindikatsiya i biotestirovanie: ucheb.
posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedeniy. 3-e izd. [Biological control of the
environment: Bioindication and bioassay: studies. allowance for stud. Higher.
Textbook. institutions]. Moscow. Izdatel’skiy tsentr «Akademiya», 2010. 288 p.
5. Grigor’ev
Yu.S., Andreev D.N. K voprosu
o metodike registratsii zamedlennoy fluorestsentsii khlorofilla pri
bioindikatsii zagryazneniya vozdushnoy sredy na khvoynykh [On the question of the method of
registration of the delayed chlorophyll fluorescence at biological indication
of air pollution on conifers] Estestvennye nauki. ¹ 2 (39), 2012. pp. 36-39.
6. Shubert
R. Vozmozhnosti primeneniya
rastitel’nykh indikatorov v biologo-tekhnicheskoy sisteme kontrolya
okruzhayushchey prirodnoy sredy [Possible
applications of plant bio-indicators in the technical system monitoring the
environment] Problemy fonovogo monitoringa sostoyaniya prirodnoy sredy.: sb.st.
L.: GMI, 1982. V. 1. pp. 104-111.
7. Andreev
D.N. Bioindikatsiya
zagryazneniya vozdushnoy sredy po zamedlennoy fluorestsentsii khlorofilla sosny
obyknovennoy [Bioindication
air pollution by delayed chlorophyll fluorescence of Scots pine] Estestvennye
nauki. ¹ 4 (45), 2013. pp. 48-51.
8. Grigor’ev
Yu.S. Fluorestsentsiya
khlorofilla v bioindikatsii zagryazneniya vozdushnoy sredy [Chlorophyll fluorescence in
biological indication of air pollution] Vestnik Mezhdunarodnoy akademii nauk
ekologii i bezopasnosti zhiznedeyatel’nosti (MANEB). 2005. T. 10, ¹4. pp.
77-91.
9. Rubin
A. B. Biofizicheskie metody v
ekologicheskom monitoringe [Biophysical
methods in environmental monitoring] Sorosovskiy obrazovatel’nyy zhurnal. 2000.
¹4. pp. 7-13.
10. Andreev
D.N. Ekogeokhimicheskaya
indikatsiya antropogennoy transformatsii sosnovykh ekosistem [Ecogeochemical indication of
anthropogenic transformation of pine ecosystems] «Russian journal of Earth
Sciences». ¹ 10 (10), 2012. pp. 44-45.
|
2
|
ÐÎÑÒ ÕÂÎÉÍÛÕ È ËÈÑÒÂÅÍÍÛÕ ÄÅÐÅÂÜÅ  ÑÂßÇÈ Ñ ÈÕ
ÔÈÒÎÖÅÍÎÒÈ×ÅÑÊÈÌ ÏÎËÎÆÅÍÈÅÌ Â ÐÀÇÍÎÂÎÇÐÀÑÒÍÛÕ ÑËÎÆÍÛÕ ÏÎÉÌÅÍÍÛÕ ËÅÑÀÕ
(ÐÅÑÏÓÁËÈÊÀ ÌÀÐÈÉ ÝË)
|
10-19
|
|
Ò.Þ. ÁÐÀÑËÀÂÑÊÀß, âåä. íàó÷. ñîòð. ëàáîðàòîðèè ñòðóêòóðíî-ôóíêöèîíàëüíîé
îðãàíèçàöèè è óñòîé÷èâîñòè ëåñíûõ ýêîñèñòåì Öåíòðà ïî ïðîáëåìàì ýêîëîãèè è
ïðîäóêòèâíîñòè ëåñîâ ÐÀÍ (ÖÝÏË ÐÀÍ), êàíä. áèîë. íàóê
t.braslavskaya@gmail.com
Öåíòð ïî ïðîáëåìàì
ýêîëîãèè è ïðîäóêòèâíîñòè ëåñîâ ÐÀÍ (ÖÝÏË ÐÀÍ)
117899 ã. Ìîñêâà, Ïðîôñîþçíàÿ óë., ä. 84/32, ñòð. 14.
 èññëåäîâàíèè èñïîëüçîâàëèñü ìåòîäû
îöåíêè æèçíåñïîñîáíîñòè è ïåðñïåêòèâ äåðåâà â ñîîáùåñòâå, îñíîâàííûå íà
äåíäðîõðîíîëîãè÷åñêîé èíôîðìàöèè. Çàòåì ñðàâíèâàëèñü ìåæäó ñîáîé äàííûå ôèòîöåíîòè÷åñêîãî
ïîëîæåíèÿ äåðåâüåâ ïî èõ ðàçìåðàì è ðîñòîâûì õàðàêòåðèñòèêàì. Îñíîâíîé èç çàäà÷
áûëî âûÿñíèòü è ñîïîñòàâèòü òåíäåíöèè èçìåíåíèé ðàäèàëüíîãî ïðèðîñòà ó
äåðåâüåâ, ðàñòóùèõ â ñîñòàâå ðàçíûõ ÿðóñîâ äðåâîñòîÿ. Äëÿ õàðàêòåðèñòèêè
ñîñòàâà è ñòðóêòóðû äðåâîñòîÿ áûëè çàëîæåíû âðåìåííûå ïðîáíûå ïëîùàäè. Ïðè
ïåðå÷åòå èçìåðÿëè äèàìåòðû ñòâîëîâ è ðàäèóñû êðîí â 4-õ íàïðàâëåíèÿõ,
ðåãèñòðèðîâàëè æèçíåííóþ ôîðìó, ñâåäåíèÿ î íàêëîíå èëè èñêðèâëåíèè ñòâîëà,
óñûõàíèè èëè äðóãèõ ïîâðåæäåíèÿõ êðîíû, î íàëè÷èè çàòåíåíèÿ ñâåðõó è ñ áîêîâ
êðîíû. Äëÿ äåíäðîõðîíîëîãè÷åñêèõ èññëåäîâàíèé âûáèðàëèñü ìîäåëüíûå äåðåâüÿ ëèïû
ìåëêîëèñòíîé (Tilia cordata Mill.), åëè ôèíñêîé (Picea x fennica (Regel) Kom.)
è ïèõòû ñèáèðñêîé (Abies sibirica Ledeb.), ïîñêîëüêó â èññëåäóåìûõ ñîîáùåñòâàõ
ó ýòèõ âèäîâ íàèáîëåå ÷åòêî âûðàæåíû ãðàíèöû êîëåö â ñòðóêòóðå äðåâåñèíû. Â
êàæäîì ÿðóñå îòáèðàëèñü íàèáîëåå âûñîêèå äåðåâüÿ â äàííîì ñîîáùåñòâå è òèïè÷íûå
ïî âûñîòå ó êàæäîãî âèäà â ïðåäñòàâëåííîì ñîîáùåñòâå. Ó èññëåäóåìûõ äåðåâüåâ
áûëè èçìåðåíû îáùàÿ âûñîòà è âûñîòà ðàñïîëîæåíèÿ íèæíåé ãðàíèöû æèâîé êðîíû,
ïðîâåäåíà âèçóàëüíàÿ îöåíêà êîëè÷åñòâà îðãàíîâ ïëîäîíîøåíèÿ è èõ ëîêàëèçàöèè â
êðîíå, à òàêæå îòîáðàíû êåðíû ó îñíîâàíèÿ ñòâîëà. Íà îñíîâå àíàëèçà
äåíäðîõðîíîëîãè÷åñêèõ äàííûõ î ðàäèàëüíîì ðîñòå åëè, ïèõòû è ëèïû â ñîñòàâå ïîéìåííûõ
ëåñîâ ñ âûðàæåííîé îêîííîé ìîçàèêîé ïîëîãà, ñäåëàíî çàêëþ÷åíèå, ÷òî èõ
âîçîáíîâëåíèå â òàêèõ ñîîáùåñòâàõ èìååò áîëüøå ïåðñïåêòèâ äëÿ âûæèâàíèÿ, ÷åì â
ëåñàõ ñ ñîìêíóòûì ïîëîãîì.
Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ïîéìåííûå ëåñà, äèíàìèêà è
ìîçàèêà ïîëîãà, ðàäèàëüíûé ðîñò åëè
Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê
1. Ëèïàòîâà, Â.Â. Ðàñòèòåëüíîñòü ïîéì /
Â.Â. Ëèïàòîâà // Ðàñòèòåëüíîñòü Åâðîïåéñêîé ÷àñòè ÑÑÑÐ. – Ì.: Íàóêà, 1980. – Ñ.
346-372.
2. Äåíèñîâ, À.Ê. Ïîéìåííûå äóáðàâû ëåñíîé
çîíû / À.Ê. Äåíèñîâ. – Ì.–Ë.: Ãîñëåñáóìèçäàò, 1954. – 84 ñ.
3. Áðàñëàâñêàÿ, Ò.Þ. Ìàòåðèàëû ê
õàðàêòåðèñòèêå îíòîãåíåçà è ïîïóëÿöèîííîé äèíàìèêè ëåñîîáðàçóþùèõ âèäîâ â
ïîéìåííûõ ëåñàõ çàïîâåäíèêà «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà» / Ò.Þ. Áðàñëàâñêàÿ [è äð.] //
Íàó÷íûå òðóäû ãîñ. ïðèðîäíîãî çàï. «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà». – Âûï. 5.– Éîøêàð-Îëà:
ÌàðÃÒÓ, 2012. – Ñ. 109–126.
4. Äûðåíêîâ, Ñ.À. Ñòðóêòóðà è äèíàìèêà
òàåæíûõ åëüíèêîâ / Ñ.À. Äûðåíêîâ. – Ë.: Íàóêà, 1984. – 173 ñ.
5. Àáàòóðîâ, À.Â. Åñòåñòâåííàÿ äèíàìèêà
ëåñà íà ïîñòîÿííûõ ïðîáíûõ ïëîùàäÿõ â Ïîäìîñêîâüå / À.Â. Àáàòóðîâ, Ï.Í. Ìåëàíõîëèí.
– Òóëà: Ãðèô è Ê., 2004. – 336 ñ.
6. Èñàåâ, À.Â. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå ïî÷âåííîãî è
ðàñòèòåëüíîãî ïîêðîâà â ïîéìàõ ðå÷íûõ äîëèí Ìàðèéñêîãî Ïîëåñüÿ (íà ïðèìåðå
òåððèòîðèè çàïîâåäíèêà «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà») / À.Â. Èñàåâ. – Éîøêàð-Îëà: Ìàðèéñêèé
ãîñ. òåõí. óí-ò, 2008. – 240 ñ.
7. Äåìàêîâ, Þ.Ï. Êëèìàò çàïîâåäíèêà è
õàðàêòåð èçìåí÷èâîñòè îñíîâíûõ ìåòåîðîëîãè÷åñêèõ ïîêàçàòåëåé / Þ.Ï. Äåìàêîâ //
Íàó÷íûå òðóäû ãîñ. ïðèðîäíîãî çàïîâåäíèêà «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà». – Âûï. 1. –
Éîøêàð-Îëà: Ìàð. ãîñ. òåõí. óí-ò, 2005. – Ñ. 125–150.
8. Ïîëåâùèêîâ, À.Â. Ñòðàíèöû èñòîðèè
òåððèòîðèè çàïîâåäíèêà / À.Â. Ïîëåâùèêîâ // Íàó÷íûå òðóäû ãîñ. ïðèðîäíîãî
çàïîâåäíèêà «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà». – Âûï. 1. – Éîøêàð-Îëà: Ìàð. ãîñ. òåõí. óí-ò,
2005. – Ñ. 5–22.
9. Shimatani,
I. K. The spatio-temporal forest patch dynamics inferred from the fine-scale
synchronicity in growth chronology / I. K. Shimatani, Y. Kubota // Journal of
Vegetation Science. – 2011. – V. 22. – P. 334-345.
10. Splechtna,
B. E. Disturbance history of a European old-growth mixed-species forest – A
spatial dendro-ecological analysis / B. E. Splechtna, G. Gratzer, B. A. Black
// Journal of Vegetation Science. – 2005. – V. 16. – P. 511-522.
11. Äåìàêîâ, Þ.Ï. Çàêîíîìåðíîñòè ðîñòà
äåðåâüåâ åëè â ïîéìå ðåê Áîëüøîé è Ìàëîé Êîêøàãè / Þ.Ï. Äåìàêîâ, À.Â. Èñàåâ //
Íàó÷íûå òðóäû ãîñ. ïðèðîäíîãî çàïîâåäíèêà «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà». – Âûï. 4. –
Éîøêàð-Îëà: Ìàð. ãîñ. óí-ò, 2009. – Ñ. 68-123.
12. Ãîðòèíñêèé, Ã.Á. Äèíàìèêà ãîäè÷íîãî
ïðèðîñòà åëîâûõ äðåâîñòîåâ þæíîé òàéãè è åå ëåñîõîçÿéñòâåííîå çíà÷åíèå / Ã.Á.
Ãîðòèíñêèé, À.È. Òàðàñîâ //Âîïðîñû ïðèðîñòà â ëåñîóñòðîéñòâå. – Êàóíàñ, 1967. –
Ñ. 97-104.
GROWTH
OF CONIFEROUS AND DECIDUOUS TREES DUE TO THEIR PHYTOCENOTIC POSITION IN THE
MULTI-STOREYED UNEVEN-AGED FLOODPLAIN FORESTS (MARI EL REPUBLIC)
Braslavskaya
T. Yu., PhD in
Biology, leading researcher at the the Laboratory of Forest Ecosystems
Structure and Sustainability, Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity Russian
Academy of Science
t.braslavskaya@gmail.com
Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity Russian Academy of Science,
84/32-14, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, Russia
Valuation
methods of growth power and prospects of the tree in the community based on
dendrochronological data were used for the research. Then data of trees
phytocenotic position according to their size and growth characteristics were
compared against each other. The main task was to determine and to compare
trends of trees radial growth growing within different tree layers. To
characterize the composition and stand structure temporary sample plots were
laid for. At inventory tree stems diameters and crowns radii were measured in 4
directions, life form and information about the inclination or deformation of
the tree stem, drying or other damage of the crown, about shading from the top
and from the sides of the crown were registered. For dendrochronological
research sample trees of small-leafed linden (Tilia cordata Mill.), finn spruce
(Picea x fennica (Regel) Kom.) and Siberian fir (Abies sibirica Ledeb.) were
taken, because in the studied communities in these species the borders of the
rings in the wood structure are most discernable. In each layer the highest
trees of this community and typical in height with each species in the
presented community were chosen. The total height of the studied trees and the
height of the lower border of the living crown were measured, fructification
parts quantity visual evaluation and their localization in the crown was made
and cores at the base of the stem were taken. Based on the analysis of
dendrochronological data on the radial growth of spruce, fir and linden in the
composition of floodplain forests with a distinctive gaps of patchwork mosaic
of forest canopy, it is concluded that their regeneration in such communities
has more prospects for survival than in forests with close canopy.
Key
words: floodplain forests, dynamics and patchwork mosaic of forest canopy,
spruce radial growth
References
1. Lipatova
V.V. Rastitel’nost’ poim [Floodplain vegetation]. Rastitel’nost’ Evropeyskoy chasti
SSSR [Vegetation of the
European part of the USSR], Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1980, pp. 346-372 (in
Russian).
2. Denisov
A.K. Poymennye dubravy lesnoy
zony [Floodplain oak forests
of the forest zone], Moscow – Leningrad: Goslesbumizdat Publ., 1954, 84 p (in
Russian).
3. Braslavskaya
T.Yu., Harlampieva M.V., Skomorokhova T.V., Aldokhina T.M., Tabunshchik Yu.A. Materialy k kharakteristike
ontogeneza i populyacionnoy dinamiki lesoobrazuyushchikh vidov v poymennykh
lesakh zapovednika “Bol’shaya Kokshaga” [Some
data to characterize ontogeny and population dynamics of forest tree species in
floodplain forests of the natural reserve «Bol’shaya Kokshaga»] Nauchnye trudy gosudarstvennogo
prirodnogo zapovednika «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», vypusk 5 [Scientific proceedings of the state
natural reserve «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», release 5], Yoshkar-Ola, 2012, pp.
109-126 (in Russian).
4. Dyrenkov
S.A. Struktura i dinamika
tayezhnykh el’nikov [Structure
and dynamics of boreal spruce forests], Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1984, 173 p (in
Russian).
5. Abaturov
A.V., Melanholin P.N. Estestvennayà dinamika
lesa na postoyànnykh
probnykh ploshchadyàkh v
Podmoskov’e [Natural
dynamics of forest within permanent plots in Moscow Region], Tula: Grif i K
Publ., 2004, 336 p (in Russian).
6. Isaev
A.V. Formirovanie pochvennogo
i rastitel’nogo pokrova v poymakh rechnykh dolin Mariyskogo Poles’yà (na
primere territorii zapovednika «Bol’shayà Kokshaga») [Formation of soil
and vegetation in river floodplains of Mari Poless’ye (the example of the
natural reserve «Bol’shayà Kokshaga»)],
Yoshkar-Ola: Mari State Technical University Publ., 2008, 240 p (in Russian).
7. Demakov
Yu.P. Klimat zapovednika i
harakter izmenchivosti osnovnykh meteorologicheskikh pokazateley [Climate and pattern of variability
for the basic meteorological parameters within the nature reserve] Nauchnye trudy gosudarstvennogo
prirodnogo zapovednika «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», vypusk 1 [Scientific proceedings of the State
Natural Reserve «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», release 1], Yoshkar-Ola, 2005, pp.
125-150 (in Russian).
8. Polevshchikov
A.V. Stranicy istorii
territorii zapovednika [Some
pages from the history of the reserve] Nauchnye
trudy gosudarstvennogo prirodnogo zapovednika «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», vypusk 1[Scientific
proceedings of the State Natural Reserve «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», release 1],
Yoshkar-Ola, 2005, pp. 5-22 (in Russian).
9. Shimatani
I. K., Kubota Y. The spatio-temporal forest patch dynamics inferred from the
fine-scale synchronicity in growth chronology. Journal of Vegetation Science,
2011, v. 22, pp. 334-345.
10. Splechtna
B. E., Gratzer G., Black B. A. Disturbance history of a European old-growth
mixed-species forest – A spatial dendro-ecological analysis. Journal of
Vegetation Science, 2005, v. 16, pp. 511-522.
11. Demakov
Yu.P., Isaev A.V. Zakonomernosti
rosta derev’ev eli v poymakh rek Bol’shoy i Maloy Kokshagi [pattern of growth for spruce trees in
floodplains of Greater and Lesser Kokshaga rivers].Nauchnye trudy
gosudarstvennogo prirodnogo zapovednika «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», vypusk 4 [Scientific proceedings of the State
Natural Reserve «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», release 4], Yoshkar-Ola, 2009, pp. 68-123
(in Russian).
12. Gortinskiy
G.B., Tarasov A.I. Dinamika
godichnogo prirosta elovykh drevostoev yuzhnoy taigi i ee lesokhozyàystvennoe
znachenie [Dynamics
of annual radial growth of spruce forests of the southern taiga forest and its
significance for forest management] Voprosy
prirosta v lesoustroystve [Questions
of tree increment in forest management], Kaunas, 1967, pp. 97-104 (in Russian).
|
3
|
ÌÎÐÔÎÁÈÎËÎÃÈ×ÅÑÊÀß ÕÀÐÀÊÒÅÐÈÑÒÈÊÀ ÃÅÍÅÐÀÒÈÂÍÛÕ ÎÐÃÀÍÎÂ
ÑÎÑÍÛ Â ÏÐÈÐÎÄÍÎ-ÒÅÕÍÎÃÅÍÍÛÕ ÓÑËÎÂÈßÕ (ÂÎÑÒÎ×ÍÎÅ ÇÀÁÀÉÊÀËÜÅ)
|
20-25
|
|
È.Ë. ÂÀÕÍÈÍÀ, ìë. íàó÷. ñîòð. Èíñòèòóòà ïðèðîäíûõ
ðåñóðñîâ, ýêîëîãèè è êðèîëîãèè ÑÎ ÐÀÍ, êàíä. áèîë. íàóê,
Â.Ï. ÌÀÊÀÐÎÂ, çàâ. ëàá.
ðàñòèòåëüíûõ ðåñóðñîâ Èíñòèòóòà ïðèðîäíûõ ðåñóðñîâ, ýêîëîãèè è êðèîëîãèè ÑÎ
ÐÀÍ, êàíä. áèîë. íàóê
vahnina_il@mail.ru
Èíñòèòóò ïðèðîäíûõ
ðåñóðñîâ, ýêîëîãèè è êðèîëîãèè ÑÎ ÐÀÍ (ÈÏÐÝÊ ÑÎ ÐÀÍ)
672014, ã. ×èòà, óë. Íåäîðåçîâà, ä. 16
 ñòàòüå ïðèâîäÿòñÿ ðåçóëüòàòû èçó÷åíèÿ
ìîðôîáèîëîãè÷åñêîé ðåàêöèè æåíñêîé ãåíåðàòèâíîé ñôåðû äåðåâüåâ ñîñíû
îáûêíîâåííîé, â óñëîâèÿõ ñ ðàçëè÷íîé èíòåíñèâíîñòüþ òåõíîãåííîé íàãðóçêè ñ
èçìåíÿþùèìèñÿ òåìïåðàòóðàìè âîçäóõà è êîëè÷åñòâîì îñàäêîâ ïåðèîäà âåãåòàöèè.
Ìàòåðèàëîì äëÿ èññëåäîâàíèé ñòàëè çðåëûå æåíñêèå øèøêè, îòîáðàííûå ñ ìîäåëüíûõ
äåðåâüåâ â 2008–2009 ãã. Äî ðàñêðûòèÿ øèøåê áûëè ïðîèçâåäåíû èçìåðåíèÿ äëèíû
øèøåê (âûñîòó öåíòðàëüíîé îñè ìàêðîñòðîáèëà). Çàòåì øèøêè åñòåñòâåííûì îáðàçîì
âûñóøèâàëèñü äî âûïàäåíèÿ ñåìÿí. Ïðîðàùèâàíèå ñåìÿí äëÿ îïðåäåëåíèÿ èõ êà÷åñòâà
ïðîâîäèëîñü íà áàçå ×èòèíñêîé ëåñîñåìåííîé ñòàíöèè, ñîãëàñíî ÃÎÑÒàì 13056.6-97
è 14161-86. Äèàãíîñòè÷åñêèìè êðèòåðèÿìè îöåíêè êà÷åñòâà ñåìÿí ñëóæèëè âñõîæåñòü
è ýíåðãèÿ ïðîðàñòàíèÿ. Èçìåðåíèå âûñîòû ìàêðîñòðîáèëîâ ïîçâîëèëî âûÿâèòü
äîñòîâåðíûå ðàçëè÷èÿ ìåæäó øèøêàìè óðîæàÿ â 2008 ã. è 2009 ã.. Òàê, ó øèøåê,
ñîçðåâøèõ â 2009 ã., ïî ñðàâíåíèþ ñ ïðåäøåñòâóþùèì ãîäîì îòìå÷àåòñÿ óêîðî÷åíèå
öåíòðàëüíîé îñè ìàêðîñòðîáèëà â 2–2,6 ðàçà. Èõ ñðåäíÿÿ äëèíà ïî ó÷àñòêàì
âàðüèðîâàëà îò 1,2 ñì äî 1,5 ñì (1,5 ñì íà êîíòðîëå), â òî âðåìÿ êàê äëÿ çðåëûõ
øèøåê ñîñíû óðîæàÿ 2008 ã. îíà ñîñòàâèëà îò 3,9 äî 2,9 ñì (3,1 ñì – êîíòðîëü).
Îïðåäåëåíî, ÷òî íà êàæäîì ó÷àñòêå øèøêè îäíîãî ïåðèîäà ñîçðåâàíèÿ
õàðàêòåðèçóþòñÿ ñòàáèëüíîñòüþ âûñîòû ìàêðîñòðîáèëîâ, èõ êîýôôèöèåíò
èçìåí÷èâîñòè íå ïðåâûøàåò íèçêîãî (C=8–12%) è ñðåäíåãî (C=13–20%) óðîâíÿ. Ó
øèøåê ñ ìîäåëüíûõ äåðåâüåâ ôîíîâîãî ó÷àñòêà ïî ãîäàì òàêæå îòìå÷àåòñÿ ñíèæåíèå
âûñîòû ìàêðîñòðîáèëà â 2,2 ðàçà, âàðèàöèè äàííîãî ïîêàçàòåëÿ â ïðåäåëàõ îäíîãî
ãîäà íå ïðåâûøàþò ñðåäíèõ çíà÷åíèé. Ñòàòèñòè÷åñêèå çíà÷èìûå ðàçëè÷èÿ ìåæäó
äëèíîé øèøåê ôîíîâîãî äðåâîñòîÿ è äåðåâüåâ, ïðîèçðàñòàþùèõ íà ó÷àñòêàõ ñ ðàçíîé
èíòåíñèâíîñòüþ çàãðÿçíåíèÿ, íå âûÿâëåíû. Òàêèì îáðàçîì, â èññëåäóåìîì äèàïàçîíå
ïðèðîäíî-êëèìàòè÷åñêèõ óñëîâèé îòêëèê æåíñêîé ãåíåðàòèâíîé ñôåðû ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé
íà òåõíîãåííîå âîçäåéñòâèå ïðîÿâëÿåòñÿ ëèøü â îòäåëüíûå ãîäû ñ íåáëàãîïðèÿòíûìè
êëèìàòè÷åñêèìè õàðàêòåðèñòèêàìè â íà÷àëüíûå ïåðèîäû åå ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ. Áîëåå
îò÷åòëèâî ýôôåêò ïðîÿâëÿåòñÿ ïî ýíåðãèè ïðîðàñòàíèÿ ñåìÿí, ÷òî ñîãëàñóåòñÿ ñ
äàííûìè äðóãèõ èññëåäîâàòåëåé.
Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ñîñíà, æåíñêèå øèøêè,
ñåìåíà, òåõíîãåííîå çàãðÿçíåíèå, êëèìàò
Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê
1. Ïðèäà÷à, Â.Á. Ìîðôîôèçèîëîãè÷åñêàÿ
ðåàêöèÿ Pinus sylvestris L. è Picea obovata Ledeb. ïðè òåõíîãåííîì âîçäåéñòâèè
â óñëîâèÿõ ñåâåðî-çàïàäà Ðîññèè / Â.Á. Ïðèäà÷à, Ò.À. Ñàçîíîâà, Ò.Þ. Òàëàíîâà,
À.Â. Îëü÷åâ // Ýêîëîãèÿ. – 2011. – ¹ 1. – Ñ. 25–33.
2. Àíòèïîâ, Â.Ã. Óñòîé÷èâîñòü äðåâåñíûõ
ðàñòåíèé ê ïðîìûøëåííûì ãàçàì. / Â.Ã. Àíòèïîâ. – Ìèíñê: Íàóêà è òåõíèêà, 1979.
– 216 ñ.
3. Âàõíèíà, È.Ë. Õàðàêòåðèñòèêà ñåìÿí
ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé â çåëåíîé çîíå ã. ×èòû (Âîñòî÷íîå Çàáàéêàëüå) / È.Ë. Âàõíèíà
// Âåñòíèê ÊðàñÃÀÓ. – 2009. –¹ 8. – Ñ. 98–103.
4. Ôåäîðêîâ, À.Ë. Âëèÿíèå àýðîòåõíîãåííûõ
çàãðÿçíåíèé íà ñîõðàííîñòü ñåìÿïî÷åê è ðàçâèòèå çàðîäûøà ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé /
À.Ë. Ôåäîðêîâ // Ëåñîâåäåíèå. – 1994. – ¹ 5. – Ñ. 36–40.
5. Àíèêååâ, Ä.Ð. Äèôôåðåíöèàöèÿ äåðåâüåâ
ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé ïî êîìïëåêñó ïðèçíàêîâ æåíñêîé ðåïðîäóêòèâíîé ñèñòåìû â
óñëîâèÿõ ïðîìûøëåííîãî çàãðÿçíåíèÿ / Ä.Ð. Àíèêååâ, Ë.Ã. Áàáóøêèíà // Ëåñîâåäåíèå.
– 1997. – ¹ 5. – Ñ.43–50.
6. Ýêîëîãî-ãåîõèìè÷åñêàÿ êàðòà ã. ×èòû
[Êàðòû]. / ñîñò. è ïîäãîò. ê ïå÷àòè Çàáàéêàëüñêèì àýðîãåäåçè÷åñêèì ïðåäïðèÿòèåì
Ðîñêàðòîãðàôèè â 1999 ã.; îòâ. ðåä. Ð. Í. Âîëîñèêîâ. – 1 : 30 000 – ×èòà:
Çàáàéê. àýðîãåîäåç. ïðåäïð., 1998.
7. Áîáðèíåâ, Â.Ï. Ñåìÿíîøåíèå ñîñíû è
ëèñòâåííèöû â Âîñòî÷íîì Çàáàéêàëüå / Â.Ï. Áîáðèíåâ // Ëåñîâåäåíèå. – 1985. – ¹
4. – Ñ. 62–65.
8. Ìàìàåâ, Ñ.À. Ôîðìû âíóòðèâèäîâîé
èçìåí÷èâîñòè äðåâåñíûõ ðàñòåíèé (íà ïðèìåðå ñåìåéñòâà Pinaceae íà Óðàëå). / Ñ.À.
Ìàìàåâ. – Ì.: Íàóêà, 1972. – 284 ñ.
9. Âàõíèíà, È.Ë. Ðàäèàëüíûé ïðèðîñò ñîñíû
îáûêíîâåííîé â çåëåíîé çîíå ã. ×èòû âî âòîðîé ïîëîâèíå ïðîøëîãî ñòîëåòèÿ / È.Ë.
Âàõíèíà // Ãåîãðàôèÿ è ïðèðîäíûå ðåñóðñû. – 2011. – ¹ 1. – Ñ. 180–182.
10. Ïàâëîâ, È.Í. Äèíàìèêà ïîñåâíûõ êà÷åñòâ
ñåìÿí Larix sibirica Ledeb. â íàñàæäåíèÿõ þãà Ñèáèðè ñ 1936 ïî 2000 ãã./ È.Í.
Ïàâëîâ, À. Ã. Ìèðîíîâ // Õâîéíûå áîðåàëüíîé çîíû. – 2003. – ¹ 1. – Ñ. 14–21.
MORPHOBIOLOGICAL
CHARACTERISTICS OF PINE GENERATIVE
ORGANSIN THE NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC
CONDITIONS (EASTERN ZABAIKALSK)
Vakhnina
I.L., Research
Fellow of the Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology SB RAS,
Candidate. biol. Science; Makarov
V.P., Head of the Laboratory
of plant resources of the Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology
SB RAS, Candidate. biol. Sciences
vahnina_il@mail.ru
Institute of natural resources, ecology and cryology SB RAS (INREC SB RAS),
672014, Chita, Nedorezov street, 16a
Results
of morphological reaction of the female generative sphere of pine treesstudy in
conditions with various intensity of man-causedimpact with changing air
temperatures and precipitation during vegetation period are given.
Ripedcarpellatecones takenfrom model trees in 2008-2009 serve as a research
material. Beforetheconesopeningtheir length was measured (height of
macrostrobiluscentral axis). Thenconesweredried biologically until seeds fall
from them. Seed sprouting for determine their quality was conductedat the
premises of Chita seed station, according to the State Standards 13056.6-97 and
14161-86. Germinability and germination power served as diagnostic criteria for
seeds quality valuation. Macrostrobilus height measurement allowedto identify
significant differences between cones of 2008 and 2009 harvests. Thus, cones
riped in 2009 in comparison with the previous year have shortening of
macrostrobilus central axis2-2.6 times. Their average length on the sections
varied from 1.2 cm to 1.5 cm (1.5 cm on the control), while for
pine conesripedin 2008 it ranged from 3.9 to 2.9 cm (3.1 cm control).
It is determined that in each area cones of the same ripening stage are
characterized by stable height macrostrobilus, their coefficient of variation
does not exceed low (C=8-12%) and medium (C=13-20%) level. Cones of background
area model trees also have a decrease of macrostrobilusheight 2.2 times from
year to year, variation of this indicator within one year do not exceed the
average values. Statistically significant differences between the length of
background stands and trees cones, growing on areas with different pollution
intensity, are not found. Thus, in the investigated range of natural climatic
conditions the female generative sphere of Scots pine response on anthropogenic
impact becomes evident only in respective years with unfavourable climatic
characteristics of its formationinitial stages. The effect becomes more
evidentthanks to the seeds germinativepower, that is consistent with other
researchers’ data.
Key
words: pine, carpellate cone, seeds, technogenic pollution, climate
References
1. Pridacha
V.B., Sazonova T.A., Talanova T.Yu., Ol’chev A.V. Morfofiziologicheskaya reaktsiya
Pinus sylvestris L. i Picea obovata Ledeb. pri tekhnogennom vozdeystvii v
usloviyakh severo-zapada Rossii[Morphophysiological reaction Pinus
sylvestris L. and Picea obovata Ledeb. at technogenic influence in the
conditions of Northwest Russia]. Ekologiya. 2011. ¹ 1. pp. 25-33.
2. Antipov
V.G. Ustoychivost’ drevesnykh
rasteniy k promyshlennym gazam [Sustainability
of woody plants for industrial gases]. Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika, 1979. 216 p.
3. Vakhnina
I.L. Kharakteristika semyan
sosny obyknovennoy v zelenoy zone g. Chity (Vostochnoe Zabaykal’e) [Feature pine seeds in the green city
of Chita (Eastern Transbaikalia)]. Vestnik KrasGAU. 2009. ¹ 8. pp. 98-103.
4. Fedorkov
A.L. Vliyanie
aerotekhnogennykh zagryazneniy na sokhrannost’ semyapochek i razvitie zarodysha
sosny obyknovennoy [Influence
of environmental contamination on the safety of the ovules and embryo
development of Scots pine]. Lesovedenie. 1994. ¹ 5. pp. 36-40.
5. Anikeev
D.R., Babushkina L.G. Differentsiatsiya
derev’ev sosny obyknovennoy po kompleksu priznakov zhenskoy reproduktivnoy
sistemy v usloviyakh promyshlennogo zagryazneniya [Differentiation of Scots pine trees
on a set of attributes of the female reproductive system in terms of industrial
pollution]. Lesovedenie. 1997. 5. pp.43-50.
6. Ekologo-geokhimicheskaya
karta g. Chity [Karty] / sost. i podgot. k pechati Zabaykal’skim aerogedezicheskim
predpriyatiem Roskartografii v 1999 g.; otv. red. R. N. Volosikov [Ecological-geochemical
map of the city of Chita [Maps]]. 1 : 30 000. Chita. Zabayk. aerogeodez.
predpr., 1998.
7. Bobrinev
V.P. Semyanoshenie sosny i
listvennitsy v Vostochnom Zabaykal’e [Semyanoshenie
pine and larch in East Transbaikalia]. Lesovedenie. 1985. ¹ 4. pp. 62-65.
8. Mamaev
S.A. Formy vnutrividovoy
izmenchivosti drevesnykh rasteniy (na primere semeystva Pinaceae na Urale) [Forms of intraspecific variation of
woody plants (for example, family Pinaceae in the Urals)]. Moscow. Nauka, 1972.
284 p.
9. Vakhnina
I.L. Radial’nyy prirost sosny
obyknovennoy v zelenoy zone g. Chity vo vtoroy polovine proshlogo stoletiya [Radial growth of Scots pine in the
green city of Chita in the second half of the last century]. Geografiya i
prirodnye resursy. 2011. ¹ 1. pp. 180-182.
10. Pavlov
I.N., Mironov A.G. Dinamika
posevnykh kachestv semyan Larix sibirica Ledeb. v nasazhdeniyakh yuga Sibiri s
1936 po 2000 gg. [Dynamics of
sowing qualities of seeds Larix sibirica Ledeb. plantations in the south of
Siberia from 1936 to 2000.]. Khvoynye boreal’noy zony. 2003. ¹ 1. pp.
14-21.
|
4
|
ÐÅÇÓËÜÒÀÒÛ ÈÑÑËÅÄÎÂÀÍÈß ÄÐÅÂÅÑÍÎ-ÊÎËÜÖÅÂÛÕ ÕÐÎÍÎËÎÃÈÉ ÑÎÑÍßÊÎÂ, ÏÐÎÈÇÐÀÑÒÀÞÙÈÕ ÍÀ
ÒÎÐÔßÍÛÕ ÏÎ×ÂÀÕ
|
26-30
|
|
Â.Ñ. ÂÅÐÍÎÄÓÁÅÍÊÎ, äîö. êàô. ëåñíîãî õîçÿéñòâà
Âîëîãîäñêîé ãîñóäàðñòâåííîé ìîëî÷íîõîçÿéñòâåííîé àêàäåìèè èì. Í.Â. Âåðåùàãèíà,
êàíä. ñ.-õ. íàóê
quercus45@mail.ru
ÔÃÁÎÓ ÂÏÎ ÂÃÌÕÀ èì. Í.Â.
Âåðåùàãèíà, 160555, Âîëîãäà-Ìîëî÷íîå, óë. Øìèäòà, ä. 2
 ñòàòüå ïðèâåäåíû ðåçóëüòàòû îáðàáîòêè
êåðíîâ è ñïèëîâ ñ 20 ïðîáíûõ ïëîùàäåé. Öåëüþ ïðîâåäåííûõ èññëåäîâàíèé ñòàëà
îöåíêà âëèÿíèÿ êëèìàòè÷åñêèõ ôàêòîðîâ íà äèíàìèêó ðàäèàëüíîãî ïðèðîñòà ñîñíîâûõ
äðåâîñòîåâ ïðè ðàçëè÷íûõ òèïàõ çàáîëà÷èâàíèÿ ïî÷â â Âîëîãîäñêîé îáëàñòè. Âñÿ
ìåòîäèêà ðàáîò ñâîäèëàñü ê îïðåäåëåíèþ ìîðôîëîãè÷åñêîé ñòðóêòóðû íàñàæäåíèé
(ïîðîäíûé ñîñòàâ, âûñîòà, äèàìåòð, âîçðàñò) è ãîðèçîíòàëüíîé è âåðòèêàëüíîé
äèôôåðåíöèàöèÿì äåðåâüåâ, ñîâìåñòíî ñ áîíèòåòîì è çàïàñîì. Äëÿ
äåíäðîõðîíîëîãè÷åñêîãî èññëåäîâàíèÿ èñïîëüçîâàëèñü ñïèëû è êåðíû ñ äåðåâüåâ,
êîòîðûå îòáèðàëèñü íà âûñîòíîé îòìåòêå 0,65 ì [1–5]. Â õîäå ðàáîò áûëî áûëè
ïîëó÷åíû âûâîäû î òîì, ÷òî äëÿ ñîñíû ðàñòóùåé íà òîðôÿíûõ òåððèòîðèÿõ
õàðàêòåðíà íåáîëüøàÿ âåëè÷èíà ïîãîäè÷íîé èçìåí÷èâîñòè øèðèíû ðàäèàëüíîãî
ïðèðîñòà. À òàêæå â áîëüøèíñòâå ñëó÷àåâ èçìåí÷èâîñòü òåìïåðàòóðíîãî ðåæèìà
îêðóæàþùåé ñðåäû è òîðôÿíûõ ïî÷â èç-çà èõ âûñîêîé òåïëîèçîëÿöèîííîé ñïîñîáíîñòè
íå îêàçûâàåò çíà÷èìîãî âëèÿíèÿ è âíîñèò íåçíà÷èòåëüíûé âêëàä â ôîðìèðîâàíèå è
âåëè÷èíó ïðèðîñòà ñîñíû. ×òî êàñàåòñÿ îñàäêîâ – èõ èçìåí÷èâîñòü èìååò
îïðåäåëÿþùåå âîçäåéñòâèå íà ðîñò ñîñíû ïî äèàìåòðó. Ñòîèò îòìåòèòü, ÷òî ïî ìåðå
íàñûùåííîñòè òîðôîâ âëàãîé â äðåâîñòîÿõ óâåëè÷èâàåòñÿ âëèÿíèå îñàäêîâ íà øèðèíó
ãîäè÷íûõ êîëåö. Ïîëó÷åííûå êîýôôèöèåíòû ÷óâñòâèòåëüíîñòè (0,22-0,36) óêàçûâàþò
íà òî, ÷òî èçìåí÷èâîñòü èíäåêñîâ ïðèðîñòà íåçíà÷èòåëüíà. ×òî óêàçûâàåò, íà
îäíîðîäíóþ ñòåïåíü ðåàêöèè äåðåâüåâ â äàííûõ ëåñîðàñòèòåëüíûõ óñëîâèÿõ íà
èçìåíåíèÿ âíåøíèõ ôàêòîðîâ. Êîýôôèöèåíòû êîððåëÿöèè ìåæäó èíäèâèäóàëüíûìè
õðîíîëîãèÿìè â áîëüøèíñòâå ñëó÷àåâ ïîêàçàëè çíà÷èòåëüíóþ è âûñîêóþ òåñíîòó
ñâÿçè ìåæäó ðàçìåðàìè ïðèðîñòà ó äåðåâüåâ. Ñâÿçü â êîëåáàíèÿõ øèðèíû ãîäè÷íûõ
êîëåö, êîëè÷åñòâåííî îöåíåíà ïîêàçàòåëåì ñîîòíîøåíèÿ «ñèãíàë-øóì». «Ñèãíàë» äëÿ
âñåõ îáúåêòîâ â 9 – 19 ðàç áîëüøå, ÷åì èçìåíåíèå âåëè÷èíû ïðèðîñòà, âûçâàííîå
èíäèâèäóàëüíûìè îñîáåííîñòÿìè äåðåâüåâ («øóì»).
Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ñîñíà, ðàäèàëüíûé ïðèðîñò,
òåìïåðàòóðà, îñàäêè
Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê
1. Ðèõòåð, È.Ý. Âëèÿíèå áèîëîãè÷åñêîé
ìåëèîðàöèè è ïåðèîäè÷åñêîãî íåäîñòàòêà âëàãè íà äèíàìèêó ïðèðîñòà ó ñîñíû è åëè
// Äåíäðîêëèìàòè÷åñêèå èññëåäîâàíèÿ â ÑÑÑÐ: Ìàòåðèàëû 3 Âñåñîþçíîé êîíôåðåíöèè
ïî äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãèè. – Àðõàíãåëüñê, 1978 – Ñ. 142–143
2. Ïåòðèê, Í.È. Ó÷åò ýôôåêòèâíîñòè
ëåñîîñóøåíèÿ äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãè÷åñêèì ñïîñîáîì â íåêîòîðûõ òèïàõ ëåñà
Àðõàíãåëüñêîãî ëåñõîçà / Í.È. Ïåòðèê, Ï.À. Ôåêëèñòîâ // Äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãè÷åñêèå
èññëåäîâàíèÿ â ÑÑÑÐ: Ìàòåðèàëû 3-é Âñåñîþçíîé êîíôåðåíöèè ïî
äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãèè. – Àðõàíãåëüñê, 1978 – Ñ. 174.
3. Êóêóøêèí, Å.Í. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå ãîäè÷íîãî
ñëîÿ äðåâåñèíû â îñóøåííîì è óäîáðåííîì ñîñíÿêå / Å.Í. Êóêóøêèí //
Äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãè÷åñêèå èññëåäîâàíèÿ â ÑÑÑÐ: Ìàòåðèàëû 3-é Âñåñîþçíîé
êîíôåðåíöèè ïî äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãèè. Àðõàíãåëüñê, 1978 – Ñ. 93.
4. Ëîâåëèóñ, Í.Â. Ðàäèàëüíûé ïðèðîñò ñîñíû
â ñôàãíîâûõ ñîñíÿêàõ ëåñíîé çîíû Ðîññèè è ãëîáàëüíûå ôàêòîðû ñðåäû / Í.Â.
Ëîâåëèóñ, Ê.Í. Äüÿêîíîâ, Ñ.Á. Ïàëü÷èêîâ, À.Þ. Ðåòåþì è äð. // Îáùåñòâî. Ñðåäà.
Ðàçâèòèå, 2013. – ¹ 4 (29). – Ñ. 251–259.
5. Ñòðàâèíñêåíå, Â.Ï. Äèíàìèêà ðàííåé è
ïîçäíåé äðåâåñèíû â ãîäè÷íûõ êîëüöàõ äåðåâüåâ è åå èçìåíåíèå âñëåäñòâèå
îñóøåíèÿ / Â.Ï. Ñòðàâèíñêåíå // Ëåñîâåäåíèå, 1983, ¹ 6 – Ñ. 29–34
6. Ïüÿâ÷åíêî, Í.È. Î íàó÷íûõ îñíîâàõ
êëàññèôèêàöèè áîëîòíûõ áèîãåîöåíîçîâ / Í.È. Ïüÿâ÷åíêî // Òèïû áîëîò ÑÑÑÐ è
ïðèíöèïû èõ êëàññèôèêàöèè. – Ë.: Íàóêà, 1974. – Ñ. 35–43.
7. Ñóêà÷¸â, Â.Í. Ìåòîäè÷åñêèå óêàçàíèÿ ê
èçó÷åíèþ òèïîâ ëåñà / Â.Í. Ñóêà÷¸â, Ñ.Â. Çîíí. – Ì.: ÀÍ ÑÑÑÐ, 1961. – 144 ñ.
8. Ìàçåïà, Â.Ñ. Ñîâðåìåííûå ïîäõîäû ïðè
èçó÷åíèè äåíäðîõðîíîëîãè÷åñêîé èíôîðìàöèè è àíàëèçà âðåìåííûõ ðÿäîâ / Â.Ñ.
Ìàçåïà. – Êðàñíîÿðñê: Ïðåïðèíò ÈÔ ÑÎ ÀÍ ÑÑÑÐ, 1984. – 51 ñ.
9. Ìàçåïà, Â.Ñ. Ïðîñòðàíñòâåííî-âðåìåííàÿ
èçìåí÷èâîñòü ðàäèàëüíîãî ïðèðîñòà õâîéíûõ âèäîâ äåðåâüåâ â ñóáàðêòè÷åñêèõ
ðàéîíàõ Åâðàçèè: äèññ. ... ä-ðà áèîë. íàóê / Â.Ñ. Ìàçåïà. – Åêàòåðèíáóðã, 1998
– 38 ñ.
10. Øèÿòîâ, Ñ.Ã. Ìåòîäû äåíäðîõðîíîëîãèè.
×. 1. Îñíîâû äåíäðîõðîíîëîãèè. Ñáîð è ïîëó÷åíèå äðåâåñíî-êîëüöíâîé èíôîðìàöèè.
Ó÷åáíî-ìåòîäè÷åñêîå ïîñîáèå / Ñ.Ã. Øèÿòîâ, Å.À. Âàãàíîâ, À.Â. Êèðäÿíîâ, Â.Á.
Êðóãëîâ, Â.Ñ. Ìàçåïà, Ì.Ì. Íàóçáàåâ, Ð.Ì. Õàíòåìèðîâ. – Êðàñíîÿðñê: ÊðàñÃÓ,
2000. – 80 ñ.
11. Æàâîðîíêîâ, Þ.Ì. Èñïîëüçîâàíèå ìåòîäîâ
äåíäðîõðîíîëîãèè â ñóäåáíî-áîòàíè÷åñêèõ ýêñïåðòèçàõ, ïðîèçâîäèìûõ íà áàçå ÝÊÖ
ÓÂÄ ïî Âîëîãîäñêîé îáëàñòè, ïðè ðàññëåäîâàíèè ïðåñòóïëåíèé ïî íåçàêîííûì ðóáêàì
ëåñà / Þ.Ì. Æàâîðîíêîâ // Êðèìèíàëèñòè÷åñêèå ñðåäñòâà è ìåòîäû â ðàñêðûòèè è
ðàññëåäîâàíèè ïðåñòóïëåíèé. – Ì.: ÝÊÖ ÌÂÄ ÐÔ, 2009. – Ñ. 203–206.
RESULTS
OF TREE-RING CHRONOLOGIES RESEACH
OF PINE FORESTS GROWING ON PEAT SOILS
Vernodubenko
V.S., Associate
Professor, Department of Forestry FSBEE VPO N.V. Vereshchagin VSMA
quercus45@mail.ru
FSBEE VPO N.V. Vereshchagin VSMA, 160555, Vologda-Molochnoe, Shmidta
st., 2
The
article contains the results of processing of cores and saw cuts from 20 sample
plots. The aim of the research was evaluation of climatic factors influence on
the dynamics of radial growth of pine stands with different type of soils
waterlogging in Vologda region. The whole methodology came down to the plants
morphological structure determination (species composition, height, diameter,
age) and to horizontal and ver