ÃŽ Ã¦Ã³Ã°Ã­Ã Ã«Ã¥ Ñîäåðæàíèå íîìåðîâ Ã�åäàêöèîííûé ñîâåò Òðåáîâàíèÿ ê Ã¬Ã Ã²Ã¥Ã°Ã¨Ã Ã«Ã Ã¬ äëÿ Ã¯Ã³Ã¡Ã«Ã¨ÃªÃ Ã¶Ã¨Ã¨ Îôîðìëåíèå áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêîãî ñïèñêà Îðãàíèçàöèÿ è Ã¯Ã®Ã°Ã¿Ã¤Ã®Ãª ðåöåíçèðîâàíèÿ Ã�îäïèñêà íà Ã¦Ã³Ã°Ã­Ã Ã« Èçäàòåëüñòâî Ã�åäàêöèîííàÿ ýòèêà Ñòðàíèöà ãëàâíîãî ðåäàêòîðà
 

Æóðíàë «Ã‹Ã¥Ã±Ã­Ã®Ã© âåñòíèê / Forestry Bulletin»

Ê ñïèñêó íîìåðîâ

 

Íàçâàíèå
æóðíàëà

Âåñòíèê Ìîñêîâñêîãî ãîñóäàðñòâåííîãî óíèâåðñèòåòà ëåñà Ëåñíîé âåñòíèê

 

ISSN/Êîä ÍÝÁ

1727-3749 / 17273749

Äàòà

2014/2014

Òîì

18

Âûïóñê

5

Ñòðàíèöû

6-206

Âñåãî ñòàòåé

31

 

ÄÅÍÄÐÎ 2012: ÏÅÐÑÏÅÊÒÈÂÛ ÏÐÈÌÅÍÅÍÈß ÄÐÅÂÅÑÍÎ-ÊÎËÜÖÅÂÎÉ ÈÍÔÎÐÌÀÖÈÈ ÄËß ÖÅËÅÉ ÎÕÐÀÍÛ, ÂÎÑÏÐÎÈÇÂÎÄÑÒÂÀ È ÐÀÖÈÎÍÀËÜÍÎÃÎ ÈÑÏÎËÜÇÎÂÀÍÈß ÄÐÅÂÅÑÍÎÉ ÐÀÑÒÈÒÅËÜÍÎÑÒÈ

 

1

ÁÈÎÈÍÄÈÊÀÖÈß ÑÎÑÒÎßÍÈß ÎÊÐÓÆÀÞÙÅÉ ÑÐÅÄÛ ÏΠ
ÎÒÍÎÑÈÒÅËÜÍÛÌ ÏÎÊÀÇÀÒÅËßÌ ÔËÓÎÐÅÑÖÅÍÖÈÈ ÕËÎÐÎÔÈËËÀ

6-9

Ä.Í. ÀÍÄÐÅÅÂ, çàâ. ëàáîðàòîðèåé ýêîëîãèè è îõðàíû ïðèðîäû Ïåðìñêèé ÃÍÈÓ, êàíä. ãåîãð. íàóê

andreev@psu.ru
Ïåðìñêèé ãîñóäàðñòâåííûé íàöèîíàëüíûé èññëåäîâàòåëüñêèé óíèâåðñèòåò
614990, ã. Ïåðìü, óë. Áóêèðåâà, 15

Âûïîëíåíà áèîèíäèêàöèÿ ñîñòîÿíèÿ ïðèðîäíîé ñðåäû íà äâóõ îñîáî îõðàíÿåìûõ ïðèðîäíûõ òåððèòîðèÿõ. Èññëåäîâàëèñü ýêîñèñòåìû ñîñíîâûõ ëåñîâ â ãîðîäå Ïåðìè è íà ôîíîâîé òåððèòîðèè. Èññëåäîâàíèÿ ïðîâîäèëèñü ñîãëàñíî «Ìåòîäèêå ðåãèñòðàöèè çàìåäëåííîé ôëóîðåñöåíöèè õëîðîôèëëà ïðè áèîèíäèêàöèè çàãðÿçíåíèÿ âîçäóøíîé ñðåäû íà õâîéíûõ». Íà äâóõ ïëîùàäêàõ èçìåðÿëàñü ñóòî÷íàÿ äèíàìèêà èçìåíåíèÿ çàìåäëåííîé ôëóîðåñöåíöèè íà èññëåäóåìûõ òåððèòîðèÿõ â çàâèñèìîñòè îò òåìïåðàòóðû è âëàæíîñòè âîçäóõà.  ðåçóëüòàòå ñîñòàâëåíû ãðàôèêè äíåâíîãî èçìåíåíèÿ ïàðàìåòðîâ ôîòîñèíòåçà àññèìèëÿöèîííûõ îðãàíîâ ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé íà òåððèòîðèÿõ ñ ðàçíûì óðîâíåì àíòðîïîãåííîãî âîçäåéñòâèÿ. Ïîëó÷åííûå ôîíîâûå äàííûå ñòàëè îñíîâîé äëÿ ïîäðîáíîãî èññëåäîâàíèÿ ôóíêöèîíàëüíîãî ñîñòîÿíèÿ ñîñíîâûõ ýêîñèñòåì íà îñîáî îõðàíÿåìîé ïðèðîäíîé òåððèòîðèè «×åðíÿåâñêèé ëåñ», ðàñïîëîæåííîé ïðàêòè÷åñêè â öåíòðå ãîðîäà Ïåðìè. Ïî ðåçóëüòàòàì èññëåäîâàíèÿ ñäåëàí âûâîä, ÷òî çíà÷åíèå çàìåäëåííîé ôëóîðåñöåíöèè â óñëîâèÿõ ñóùåñòâåííîé àíòðîïîãåííîé íàãðóçêè íèæå íà 25% è áîëåå îòíîñèòåëüíî ôîíà. Òàêîå îòêëîíåíèå ïîêàçàòåëÿ ñâèäåòåëüñòâóåò îá àíòðîïîãåííîì âîçäåéñòâèè äàæå íà ðàííåé ñòàäèè äåãðàäàöèè ýêîñèñòåì. Äîïîëíèòåëüíî ïðîâåäåíî ãåîõèìè÷åñêîå èññëåäîâàíèå. Ïî åãî ðåçóëüòàòàì âûÿâëåíû ðàçëè÷èÿ ïîêàçàòåëÿ êà÷åñòâà ïî÷â è õâîè ìîäåëüíûõ òåððèòîðèé.  ïî÷âàõ ëåãêîãî ìåõàíè÷åñêîãî ñîñòàâà ×åðíÿåâñêîãî ëåñà âûÿâëåíî ïðåâûøåíèå ñîäåðæàíèÿ ðÿäà ìèêðîýëåìåíòîâ. Ïî ðåçóëüòàòàì áèîèíäèêàöèè äëÿ èññëåäóåìûõ òåððèòîðèé ñîñòàâëåíû ïðîãðàììû ýêîëîãè÷åñêîãî ìîíèòîðèíãà. Ïîìèìî ýòîãî, ïðåäëîæåíû ïðèðîäîîõðàííûå ìåðîïðèÿòèÿ, êîòîðûå ïîçâîëÿò îïòèìèçèðîâàòü ñîñòîÿíèå îõðàíÿåìûõ òåððèòîðèé.

Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ïðèðîäíàÿ ñðåäà, çàãðÿçíåíèå, ôëóîðåñöåíöèÿ õëîðîôèëëà, ñîñíà îáûêíîâåííàÿ, áèîèíäèêàöèÿ

Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê

1. Áóçìàêîâ, Ñ.À. Àíòðîïîãåííàÿ òðàíñôîðìàöèÿ ïðèðîäíîé ñðåäû / Ñ.À. Áóçìàêîâ // Ãåîãðàôè÷åñêèé âåñòíèê. Ïåðìü, 2012. – ¹4 (32). – Ñ. 46–50.

2. Áóçìàêîâ, Ñ.À. Ìåòîäè÷åñêèå óêàçàíèÿ: «Ýêîëîãè÷åñêàÿ îöåíêà ñîñòîÿíèÿ îñîáî îõðàíÿåìûõ ïðèðîäíûõ òåððèòîðèé ðåãèîíàëüíîãî çíà÷åíèÿ» / Ñ.À. Áóçìàêîâ, Ñ.À. Îâåñíîâ, À.È. Øåïåëü, À.À. Çàéöåâ // Ãåîãðàôè÷åñêèé âåñòíèê, 2011. – Âûï.2. – Ñ. 49–59.

3. Ãàòèíà, Å.Ë. Àíòðîïîãåííàÿ òðàíñôîðìàöèÿ áîòàíè÷åñêîãî ðàçíîîáðàçèÿ íà òåððèòîðèè Ïåðìñêîãî êðàÿ / Å.Ë. Ãàòèíà // Ïðîáëåìû ðåãèîíàëüíîé ýêîëîãèè, 2009. – ¹ 5. – Ñ. 160–165.

4. Áèîëîãè÷åñêèé êîíòðîëü îêðóæàþùåé ñðåäû: áèîèíäèêàöèÿ è áèîòåñòèðîâàíèå: ó÷åá. ïîñîáèå äëÿ ñòóä. âûñø. ó÷åá. çàâåäåíèé / ïîä ðåä. Î.Ï. Ìåëåõîâîé è Å.È. Ñàðàïóëüöåâîé. – 3-å èçä., ñòåð. – Ì.: Èçäàòåëüñêèé öåíòð «Àêàäåìèÿ», 2010. – 288 ñ.

5. Ãðèãîðüåâ, Þ.Ñ. Ê âîïðîñó î ìåòîäèêå ðåãèñòðàöèè çàìåäëåííîé ôëóîðåñöåíöèè õëîðîôèëëà ïðè áèîèíäèêàöèè çàãðÿçíåíèÿ âîçäóøíîé ñðåäû íà õâîéíûõ / Þ.Ñ. Ãðèãîðüåâ, Ä.Í. Àíäðååâ // Åñòåñòâåííûå íàóêè, 2012. – ¹ 2 (39). – Ñ. 36–39.

6. Øóáåðò, Ð. Âîçìîæíîñòè ïðèìåíåíèÿ ðàñòèòåëüíûõ èíäèêàòîðîâ â áèîëîãî-òåõíè÷åñêîé ñèñòåìå êîíòðîëÿ îêðóæàþùåé ïðèðîäíîé ñðåäû / Ð. Øóáåðò // Ïðîáëåìû ôîíîâîãî ìîíèòîðèíãà ñîñòîÿíèÿ ïðèðîäíîé ñðåäû: ñá.ñò. – Ë.: ÃÌÈ, 1982. – Âûï. 1. – Ñ. 104–111.

7. Àíäðååâ, Ä.Í. Áèîèíäèêàöèÿ çàãðÿçíåíèÿ âîçäóøíîé ñðåäû ïî çàìåäëåííîé ôëóîðåñöåíöèè õëîðîôèëëà ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé / Ä.Í. Àíäðååâ // Åñòåñòâåííûå íàóêè, 2013. – ¹ 4 (45). – Ñ. 48–51.

8. Ãðèãîðüåâ, Þ.Ñ. Ôëóîðåñöåíöèÿ õëîðîôèëëà â áèîèíäèêàöèè çàãðÿçíåíèÿ âîçäóøíîé ñðåäû / Þ.Ñ. Ãðèãîðüåâ // Âåñòíèê Ìåæäóíàðîäíîé àêàäåìèè íàóê ýêîëîãèè è áåçîïàñíîñòè æèçíåäåÿòåëüíîñòè (ÌÀÍÝÁ). – 2005. – Ò. 10. – ¹4. – Ñ. 77–91.

9. Ðóáèí, À.Á. Áèîôèçè÷åñêèå ìåòîäû â ýêîëîãè÷åñêîì ìîíèòîðèíãå / À.Á. Ðóáèí // Ñîðîñîâñêèé îáðàçîâàòåëüíûé æóðíàë. – 2000. – ¹4. – Ñ. 7–13.

10. Àíäðååâ, Ä.Í. Ýêîãåîõèìè÷åñêàÿ èíäèêàöèÿ àíòðîïîãåííîé òðàíñôîðìàöèè ñîñíîâûõ ýêîñèñòåì / Ä.Í. Àíäðååâ // Russian journal of Earth Sciences. – ¹ 10(10). – 2012. – Ñ. 44–45.

 

BIOINDICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS accoringtoRELATIVE INDICATORS OF CHLOROPHYLL FLUORESCENCE

Andreev D.N., Head of the laboratory of ecology and nature protection, Perm State National Research University

andreev@psu.ru
Perm State National Research University, 614990, Perm, Bukireva str., 15

Development of a new sampling measuring method of forest estimation is associated with necessity to replace outdated materials of forestry management and getting the real picture of the quantitative and qualitative state of forest resources in the specific objects with minimum material and money costs. The article describes the development of effective and inexpensive method based on the use of earth remote sensing and selection method of forest estimation allowing to determine the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the plants, to design measures for protection and reproduction of forests and prepare various thematic maps of timber lands. On the fist stages of development and implementation of the proposed method, the accuracy of the volume determination, as the basic valuation measure, can be focused on the accuracy of recommended forest management instruction for the second category of forest resource management works, with certain correcting of the forest resource specificity in the site. The following accuracy of volume determination is recommended from 10 % in coniferous strata up to 30 % in aspen young growths. An extremely important issue that is to be solved when applying the statistical sampling methods of forest inventory operations is the determination of the sampling volume (number of sampling units). When determining the number of units it is necessary to take into account the fact that the allocated homogeneous forest area (stratum) will consist of different, often discrepant parts. Cost certification for performance of work according to the proposed method of forest estimation shows the possibility of its application with high economic efficiency. Thus, when the area of the object is 1 million hectare, the necessity to include sampling units in the range of 550-600 pieces, the cost of work in terms of 1 hectare will be about 30-35 rub/ha.

Key words: remote sensing, plotless survey, strata, volume

 

References

 

1. Buzmakov S.A. Antropogennaya transformatsiya prirodnoy sredy [Anthropogenic transformation of the natural environment] Geograficheskiy vestnik. Perm’, 2012. ¹ 4 (32). pp. 46-50.

2. Buzmakov S.A.. Ovesnov S.A., Shepel’ A.I., Zaytsev A.A. Metodicheskie ukazaniya: «Ekologicheskaya otsenka sostoyaniya osobo okhranyaemykh prirodnykh territoriy regional’nogo znacheniya»[Guidelines: “Environmental assessment of the protected areas of regional significance”] Geograficheskiy vestnik. Perm’, 2011. V. 2. pp. 49-59.

3. Gatina E.L. Antropogennaya transformatsiya botanicheskogo raznoobraziya na territorii Permskogo kraya [Anthropogenic transformation of botanical diversity in the Perm region] Problemy regional’noy ekologii ¹5, 2009. pp.160-165.

4. Biologicheskiy kontrol’ okruzhayushchey sredy: bioindikatsiya i biotestirovanie: ucheb. posobie dlya stud. vyssh. ucheb. zavedeniy. 3-e izd. [Biological control of the environment: Bioindication and bioassay: studies. allowance for stud. Higher. Textbook. institutions]. Moscow. Izdatel’skiy tsentr «Akademiya», 2010. 288 p.

5. Grigor’ev Yu.S., Andreev D.N. K voprosu o metodike registratsii zamedlennoy fluorestsentsii khlorofilla pri bioindikatsii zagryazneniya vozdushnoy sredy na khvoynykh [On the question of the method of registration of the delayed chlorophyll fluorescence at biological indication of air pollution on conifers] Estestvennye nauki. ¹ 2 (39), 2012. pp. 36-39.

6. Shubert R. Vozmozhnosti primeneniya rastitel’nykh indikatorov v biologo-tekhnicheskoy sisteme kontrolya okruzhayushchey prirodnoy sredy [Possible applications of plant bio-indicators in the technical system monitoring the environment] Problemy fonovogo monitoringa sostoyaniya prirodnoy sredy.: sb.st. L.: GMI, 1982. V. 1. pp. 104-111.

7. Andreev D.N. Bioindikatsiya zagryazneniya vozdushnoy sredy po zamedlennoy fluorestsentsii khlorofilla sosny obyknovennoy [Bioindication air pollution by delayed chlorophyll fluorescence of Scots pine] Estestvennye nauki. ¹ 4 (45), 2013. pp. 48-51.

8. Grigor’ev Yu.S. Fluorestsentsiya khlorofilla v bioindikatsii zagryazneniya vozdushnoy sredy [Chlorophyll fluorescence in biological indication of air pollution] Vestnik Mezhdunarodnoy akademii nauk ekologii i bezopasnosti zhiznedeyatel’nosti (MANEB). 2005. T. 10, ¹4. pp. 77-91.

9. Rubin A. B. Biofizicheskie metody v ekologicheskom monitoringe [Biophysical methods in environmental monitoring] Sorosovskiy obrazovatel’nyy zhurnal. 2000. ¹4. pp. 7-13.

10. Andreev D.N. Ekogeokhimicheskaya indikatsiya antropogennoy transformatsii sosnovykh ekosistem [Ecogeochemical indication of anthropogenic transformation of pine ecosystems] «Russian journal of Earth Sciences». ¹ 10 (10), 2012. pp. 44-45.

 

2

ÐÎÑÒ ÕÂÎÉÍÛÕ È ËÈÑÒÂÅÍÍÛÕ ÄÅÐÅÂÜÅ  ÑÂßÇÈ Ñ ÈÕ 
ÔÈÒÎÖÅÍÎÒÈ×ÅÑÊÈÌ ÏÎËÎÆÅÍÈÅÌ Â ÐÀÇÍÎÂÎÇÐÀÑÒÍÛÕ ÑËÎÆÍÛÕ ÏÎÉÌÅÍÍÛÕ ËÅÑÀÕ (ÐÅÑÏÓÁËÈÊÀ ÌÀÐÈÉ ÝË)

10-19

Ò.Þ. ÁÐÀÑËÀÂÑÊÀß, âåä. íàó÷. ñîòð. ëàáîðàòîðèè ñòðóêòóðíî-ôóíêöèîíàëüíîé îðãàíèçàöèè è óñòîé÷èâîñòè ëåñíûõ ýêîñèñòåì Öåíòðà ïî ïðîáëåìàì ýêîëîãèè è ïðîäóêòèâíîñòè ëåñîâ ÐÀÍ (ÖÝÏË ÐÀÍ), êàíä. áèîë. íàóê

t.braslavskaya@gmail.com
Öåíòð ïî ïðîáëåìàì ýêîëîãèè è ïðîäóêòèâíîñòè ëåñîâ ÐÀÍ (ÖÝÏË ÐÀÍ)
117899 ã. Ìîñêâà, Ïðîôñîþçíàÿ óë., ä. 84/32, ñòð. 14.

 èññëåäîâàíèè èñïîëüçîâàëèñü ìåòîäû îöåíêè æèçíåñïîñîáíîñòè è ïåðñïåêòèâ äåðåâà â ñîîáùåñòâå, îñíîâàííûå íà äåíäðîõðîíîëîãè÷åñêîé èíôîðìàöèè. Çàòåì ñðàâíèâàëèñü ìåæäó ñîáîé äàííûå ôèòîöåíîòè÷åñêîãî ïîëîæåíèÿ äåðåâüåâ ïî èõ ðàçìåðàì è ðîñòîâûì õàðàêòåðèñòèêàì. Îñíîâíîé èç çàäà÷ áûëî âûÿñíèòü è ñîïîñòàâèòü òåíäåíöèè èçìåíåíèé ðàäèàëüíîãî ïðèðîñòà ó äåðåâüåâ, ðàñòóùèõ â ñîñòàâå ðàçíûõ ÿðóñîâ äðåâîñòîÿ. Äëÿ õàðàêòåðèñòèêè ñîñòàâà è ñòðóêòóðû äðåâîñòîÿ áûëè çàëîæåíû âðåìåííûå ïðîáíûå ïëîùàäè. Ïðè ïåðå÷åòå èçìåðÿëè äèàìåòðû ñòâîëîâ è ðàäèóñû êðîí â 4-õ íàïðàâëåíèÿõ, ðåãèñòðèðîâàëè æèçíåííóþ ôîðìó, ñâåäåíèÿ î íàêëîíå èëè èñêðèâëåíèè ñòâîëà, óñûõàíèè èëè äðóãèõ ïîâðåæäåíèÿõ êðîíû, î íàëè÷èè çàòåíåíèÿ ñâåðõó è ñ áîêîâ êðîíû. Äëÿ äåíäðîõðîíîëîãè÷åñêèõ èññëåäîâàíèé âûáèðàëèñü ìîäåëüíûå äåðåâüÿ ëèïû ìåëêîëèñòíîé (Tilia cordata Mill.), åëè ôèíñêîé (Picea x fennica (Regel) Kom.) è ïèõòû ñèáèðñêîé (Abies sibirica Ledeb.), ïîñêîëüêó â èññëåäóåìûõ ñîîáùåñòâàõ ó ýòèõ âèäîâ íàèáîëåå ÷åòêî âûðàæåíû ãðàíèöû êîëåö â ñòðóêòóðå äðåâåñèíû.  êàæäîì ÿðóñå îòáèðàëèñü íàèáîëåå âûñîêèå äåðåâüÿ â äàííîì ñîîáùåñòâå è òèïè÷íûå ïî âûñîòå ó êàæäîãî âèäà â ïðåäñòàâëåííîì ñîîáùåñòâå. Ó èññëåäóåìûõ äåðåâüåâ áûëè èçìåðåíû îáùàÿ âûñîòà è âûñîòà ðàñïîëîæåíèÿ íèæíåé ãðàíèöû æèâîé êðîíû, ïðîâåäåíà âèçóàëüíàÿ îöåíêà êîëè÷åñòâà îðãàíîâ ïëîäîíîøåíèÿ è èõ ëîêàëèçàöèè â êðîíå, à òàêæå îòîáðàíû êåðíû ó îñíîâàíèÿ ñòâîëà. Íà îñíîâå àíàëèçà äåíäðîõðîíîëîãè÷åñêèõ äàííûõ î ðàäèàëüíîì ðîñòå åëè, ïèõòû è ëèïû â ñîñòàâå ïîéìåííûõ ëåñîâ ñ âûðàæåííîé îêîííîé ìîçàèêîé ïîëîãà, ñäåëàíî çàêëþ÷åíèå, ÷òî èõ âîçîáíîâëåíèå â òàêèõ ñîîáùåñòâàõ èìååò áîëüøå ïåðñïåêòèâ äëÿ âûæèâàíèÿ, ÷åì â ëåñàõ ñ ñîìêíóòûì ïîëîãîì.

Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ïîéìåííûå ëåñà, äèíàìèêà è ìîçàèêà ïîëîãà, ðàäèàëüíûé ðîñò åëè

Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê

 

1. Ëèïàòîâà, Â.Â. Ðàñòèòåëüíîñòü ïîéì / Â.Â. Ëèïàòîâà // Ðàñòèòåëüíîñòü Åâðîïåéñêîé ÷àñòè ÑÑÑÐ. – Ì.: Íàóêà, 1980. – Ñ. 346-372.

2. Äåíèñîâ, À.Ê. Ïîéìåííûå äóáðàâû ëåñíîé çîíû / À.Ê. Äåíèñîâ. – Ì.–Ë.: Ãîñëåñáóìèçäàò, 1954. – 84 ñ.

3. Áðàñëàâñêàÿ, Ò.Þ. Ìàòåðèàëû ê õàðàêòåðèñòèêå îíòîãåíåçà è ïîïóëÿöèîííîé äèíàìèêè ëåñîîáðàçóþùèõ âèäîâ â ïîéìåííûõ ëåñàõ çàïîâåäíèêà «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà» / Ò.Þ. Áðàñëàâñêàÿ [è äð.] // Íàó÷íûå òðóäû ãîñ. ïðèðîäíîãî çàï. «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà». – Âûï. 5.– Éîøêàð-Îëà: ÌàðÃÒÓ, 2012. – Ñ. 109–126.

4. Äûðåíêîâ, Ñ.À. Ñòðóêòóðà è äèíàìèêà òàåæíûõ åëüíèêîâ / Ñ.À. Äûðåíêîâ. – Ë.: Íàóêà, 1984. – 173 ñ.

5. Àáàòóðîâ, À.Â. Åñòåñòâåííàÿ äèíàìèêà ëåñà íà ïîñòîÿííûõ ïðîáíûõ ïëîùàäÿõ â Ïîäìîñêîâüå / À.Â. Àáàòóðîâ, Ï.Í. Ìåëàíõîëèí. – Òóëà: Ãðèô è Ê., 2004. – 336 ñ.

6. Èñàåâ, À.Â. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå ïî÷âåííîãî è ðàñòèòåëüíîãî ïîêðîâà â ïîéìàõ ðå÷íûõ äîëèí Ìàðèéñêîãî Ïîëåñüÿ (íà ïðèìåðå òåððèòîðèè çàïîâåäíèêà «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà») / À.Â. Èñàåâ. – Éîøêàð-Îëà: Ìàðèéñêèé ãîñ. òåõí. óí-ò, 2008. – 240 ñ.

7. Äåìàêîâ, Þ.Ï. Êëèìàò çàïîâåäíèêà è õàðàêòåð èçìåí÷èâîñòè îñíîâíûõ ìåòåîðîëîãè÷åñêèõ ïîêàçàòåëåé / Þ.Ï. Äåìàêîâ // Íàó÷íûå òðóäû ãîñ. ïðèðîäíîãî çàïîâåäíèêà «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà». – Âûï. 1. – Éîøêàð-Îëà: Ìàð. ãîñ. òåõí. óí-ò, 2005. – Ñ. 125–150.

8. Ïîëåâùèêîâ, À.Â. Ñòðàíèöû èñòîðèè òåððèòîðèè çàïîâåäíèêà / À.Â. Ïîëåâùèêîâ // Íàó÷íûå òðóäû ãîñ. ïðèðîäíîãî çàïîâåäíèêà «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà». – Âûï. 1. – Éîøêàð-Îëà: Ìàð. ãîñ. òåõí. óí-ò, 2005. – Ñ. 5–22.

9. Shimatani, I. K. The spatio-temporal forest patch dynamics inferred from the fine-scale synchronicity in growth chronology / I. K. Shimatani, Y. Kubota // Journal of Vegetation Science. – 2011. – V. 22. – P. 334-345.

10. Splechtna, B. E. Disturbance history of a European old-growth mixed-species forest – A spatial dendro-ecological analysis / B. E. Splechtna, G. Gratzer, B. A. Black // Journal of Vegetation Science. – 2005. – V. 16. – P. 511-522.

11. Äåìàêîâ, Þ.Ï. Çàêîíîìåðíîñòè ðîñòà äåðåâüåâ åëè â ïîéìå ðåê Áîëüøîé è Ìàëîé Êîêøàãè / Þ.Ï. Äåìàêîâ, À.Â. Èñàåâ // Íàó÷íûå òðóäû ãîñ. ïðèðîäíîãî çàïîâåäíèêà «Áîëüøàÿ Êîêøàãà». – Âûï. 4. – Éîøêàð-Îëà: Ìàð. ãîñ. óí-ò, 2009. – Ñ. 68-123.

12. Ãîðòèíñêèé, Ã.Á. Äèíàìèêà ãîäè÷íîãî ïðèðîñòà åëîâûõ äðåâîñòîåâ þæíîé òàéãè è åå ëåñîõîçÿéñòâåííîå çíà÷åíèå / Ã.Á. Ãîðòèíñêèé, À.È. Òàðàñîâ //Âîïðîñû ïðèðîñòà â ëåñîóñòðîéñòâå. – Êàóíàñ, 1967. – Ñ. 97-104.

 

GROWTH OF CONIFEROUS AND DECIDUOUS TREES DUE TO THEIR PHYTOCENOTIC POSITION IN THE MULTI-STOREYED UNEVEN-AGED FLOODPLAIN FORESTS (MARI EL REPUBLIC)

Braslavskaya T. Yu., PhD in Biology, leading researcher at the the Laboratory of Forest Ecosystems Structure and Sustainability, Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity Russian Academy of Science

t.braslavskaya@gmail.com
Center for Forest Ecology and Productivity Russian Academy of Science, 84/32-14, Profsoyuznaya Str., Moscow, Russia

Valuation methods of growth power and prospects of the tree in the community based on dendrochronological data were used for the research. Then data of trees phytocenotic position according to their size and growth characteristics were compared against each other. The main task was to determine and to compare trends of trees radial growth growing within different tree layers. To characterize the composition and stand structure temporary sample plots were laid for. At inventory tree stems diameters and crowns radii were measured in 4 directions, life form and information about the inclination or deformation of the tree stem, drying or other damage of the crown, about shading from the top and from the sides of the crown were registered. For dendrochronological research sample trees of small-leafed linden (Tilia cordata Mill.), finn spruce (Picea x fennica (Regel) Kom.) and Siberian fir (Abies sibirica Ledeb.) were taken, because in the studied communities in these species the borders of the rings in the wood structure are most discernable. In each layer the highest trees of this community and typical in height with each species in the presented community were chosen. The total height of the studied trees and the height of the lower border of the living crown were measured, fructification parts quantity visual evaluation and their localization in the crown was made and cores at the base of the stem were taken. Based on the analysis of dendrochronological data on the radial growth of spruce, fir and linden in the composition of floodplain forests with a distinctive gaps of patchwork mosaic of forest canopy, it is concluded that their regeneration in such communities has more prospects for survival than in forests with close canopy.

Key words: floodplain forests, dynamics and patchwork mosaic of forest canopy, spruce radial growth

 

References

 

1. Lipatova V.V. Rastitel’nost’ poim [Floodplain vegetation]. Rastitel’nost’ Evropeyskoy chasti SSSR [Vegetation of the European part of the USSR], Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1980, pp. 346-372 (in Russian).

2. Denisov A.K. Poymennye dubravy lesnoy zony [Floodplain oak forests of the forest zone], Moscow – Leningrad: Goslesbumizdat Publ., 1954, 84 p (in Russian).

3. Braslavskaya T.Yu., Harlampieva M.V., Skomorokhova T.V., Aldokhina T.M., Tabunshchik Yu.A. Materialy k kharakteristike ontogeneza i populyacionnoy dinamiki lesoobrazuyushchikh vidov v poymennykh lesakh zapovednika “Bol’shaya Kokshaga” [Some data to characterize ontogeny and population dynamics of forest tree species in floodplain forests of the natural reserve «Bol’shaya Kokshaga»] Nauchnye trudy gosudarstvennogo prirodnogo zapovednika «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», vypusk 5 [Scientific proceedings of the state natural reserve «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», release 5], Yoshkar-Ola, 2012, pp. 109-126 (in Russian).

4. Dyrenkov S.A. Struktura i dinamika tayezhnykh el’nikov [Structure and dynamics of boreal spruce forests], Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1984, 173 p (in Russian).

5. Abaturov A.V., Melanholin P.N. Estestvennayà dinamika lesa na postoyànnykh probnykh ploshchadyàkh v Podmoskov’e [Natural dynamics of forest within permanent plots in Moscow Region], Tula: Grif i K Publ., 2004, 336 p (in Russian).

6. Isaev A.V. Formirovanie pochvennogo i rastitel’nogo pokrova v poymakh rechnykh dolin Mariyskogo Poles’yà (na primere territorii zapovednika «Bol’shayà Kokshaga») [Formation of soil and vegetation in river floodplains of Mari Poless’ye (the example of the natural reserve «Bol’shayà Kokshaga»)], Yoshkar-Ola: Mari State Technical University Publ., 2008, 240 p (in Russian).

7. Demakov Yu.P. Klimat zapovednika i harakter izmenchivosti osnovnykh meteorologicheskikh pokazateley [Climate and pattern of variability for the basic meteorological parameters within the nature reserve] Nauchnye trudy gosudarstvennogo prirodnogo zapovednika «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», vypusk 1 [Scientific proceedings of the State Natural Reserve «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», release 1], Yoshkar-Ola, 2005, pp. 125-150 (in Russian).

8. Polevshchikov A.V. Stranicy istorii territorii zapovednika [Some pages from the history of the reserve] Nauchnye trudy gosudarstvennogo prirodnogo zapovednika «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», vypusk 1[Scientific proceedings of the State Natural Reserve «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», release 1], Yoshkar-Ola, 2005, pp. 5-22 (in Russian).

9. Shimatani I. K., Kubota Y. The spatio-temporal forest patch dynamics inferred from the fine-scale synchronicity in growth chronology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2011, v. 22, pp. 334-345.

10. Splechtna B. E., Gratzer G., Black B. A. Disturbance history of a European old-growth mixed-species forest – A spatial dendro-ecological analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2005, v. 16, pp. 511-522.

11. Demakov Yu.P., Isaev A.V. Zakonomernosti rosta derev’ev eli v poymakh rek Bol’shoy i Maloy Kokshagi [pattern of growth for spruce trees in floodplains of Greater and Lesser Kokshaga rivers].Nauchnye trudy gosudarstvennogo prirodnogo zapovednika «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», vypusk 4 [Scientific proceedings of the State Natural Reserve «Bol’shaya Kokshaga», release 4], Yoshkar-Ola, 2009, pp. 68-123 (in Russian).

12. Gortinskiy G.B., Tarasov A.I. Dinamika godichnogo prirosta elovykh drevostoev yuzhnoy taigi i ee lesokhozyàystvennoe znachenie [Dynamics of annual radial growth of spruce forests of the southern taiga forest and its significance for forest management] Voprosy prirosta v lesoustroystve [Questions of tree increment in forest management], Kaunas, 1967, pp. 97-104 (in Russian).

 

3

ÌÎÐÔÎÁÈÎËÎÃÈ×ÅÑÊÀß ÕÀÐÀÊÒÅÐÈÑÒÈÊÀ ÃÅÍÅÐÀÒÈÂÍÛÕ ÎÐÃÀÍΠÑÎÑÍÛ Â ÏÐÈÐÎÄÍÎ-ÒÅÕÍÎÃÅÍÍÛÕ ÓÑËÎÂÈßÕ (ÂÎÑÒÎ×ÍÎÅ ÇÀÁÀÉÊÀËÜÅ)

20-25

È.Ë. ÂÀÕÍÈÍÀ, ìë. íàó÷. ñîòð. Èíñòèòóòà ïðèðîäíûõ ðåñóðñîâ, ýêîëîãèè è êðèîëîãèè ÑÎ ÐÀÍ, êàíä. áèîë. íàóê,
Â.Ï. ÌÀÊÀÐÎÂ, çàâ. ëàá. ðàñòèòåëüíûõ ðåñóðñîâ Èíñòèòóòà ïðèðîäíûõ ðåñóðñîâ, ýêîëîãèè è êðèîëîãèè ÑÎ ÐÀÍ, êàíä. áèîë. íàóê

vahnina_il@mail.ru
Èíñòèòóò ïðèðîäíûõ ðåñóðñîâ, ýêîëîãèè è êðèîëîãèè ÑÎ ÐÀÍ (ÈÏÐÝÊ ÑÎ ÐÀÍ)
672014, ã. ×èòà, óë. Íåäîðåçîâà, ä. 16

 ñòàòüå ïðèâîäÿòñÿ ðåçóëüòàòû èçó÷åíèÿ ìîðôîáèîëîãè÷åñêîé ðåàêöèè æåíñêîé ãåíåðàòèâíîé ñôåðû äåðåâüåâ ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé, â óñëîâèÿõ ñ ðàçëè÷íîé èíòåíñèâíîñòüþ òåõíîãåííîé íàãðóçêè ñ èçìåíÿþùèìèñÿ òåìïåðàòóðàìè âîçäóõà è êîëè÷åñòâîì îñàäêîâ ïåðèîäà âåãåòàöèè. Ìàòåðèàëîì äëÿ èññëåäîâàíèé ñòàëè çðåëûå æåíñêèå øèøêè, îòîáðàííûå ñ ìîäåëüíûõ äåðåâüåâ â 2008–2009 ãã. Äî ðàñêðûòèÿ øèøåê áûëè ïðîèçâåäåíû èçìåðåíèÿ äëèíû øèøåê (âûñîòó öåíòðàëüíîé îñè ìàêðîñòðîáèëà). Çàòåì øèøêè åñòåñòâåííûì îáðàçîì âûñóøèâàëèñü äî âûïàäåíèÿ ñåìÿí. Ïðîðàùèâàíèå ñåìÿí äëÿ îïðåäåëåíèÿ èõ êà÷åñòâà ïðîâîäèëîñü íà áàçå ×èòèíñêîé ëåñîñåìåííîé ñòàíöèè, ñîãëàñíî ÃÎÑÒàì 13056.6-97 è 14161-86. Äèàãíîñòè÷åñêèìè êðèòåðèÿìè îöåíêè êà÷åñòâà ñåìÿí ñëóæèëè âñõîæåñòü è ýíåðãèÿ ïðîðàñòàíèÿ. Èçìåðåíèå âûñîòû ìàêðîñòðîáèëîâ ïîçâîëèëî âûÿâèòü äîñòîâåðíûå ðàçëè÷èÿ ìåæäó øèøêàìè óðîæàÿ â 2008 ã. è 2009 ã.. Òàê, ó øèøåê, ñîçðåâøèõ â 2009 ã., ïî ñðàâíåíèþ ñ ïðåäøåñòâóþùèì ãîäîì îòìå÷àåòñÿ óêîðî÷åíèå öåíòðàëüíîé îñè ìàêðîñòðîáèëà â 2–2,6 ðàçà. Èõ ñðåäíÿÿ äëèíà ïî ó÷àñòêàì âàðüèðîâàëà îò 1,2 ñì äî 1,5 ñì (1,5 ñì íà êîíòðîëå), â òî âðåìÿ êàê äëÿ çðåëûõ øèøåê ñîñíû óðîæàÿ 2008 ã. îíà ñîñòàâèëà îò 3,9 äî 2,9 ñì (3,1 ñì – êîíòðîëü). Îïðåäåëåíî, ÷òî íà êàæäîì ó÷àñòêå øèøêè îäíîãî ïåðèîäà ñîçðåâàíèÿ õàðàêòåðèçóþòñÿ ñòàáèëüíîñòüþ âûñîòû ìàêðîñòðîáèëîâ, èõ êîýôôèöèåíò èçìåí÷èâîñòè íå ïðåâûøàåò íèçêîãî (C=8–12%) è ñðåäíåãî (C=13–20%) óðîâíÿ. Ó øèøåê ñ ìîäåëüíûõ äåðåâüåâ ôîíîâîãî ó÷àñòêà ïî ãîäàì òàêæå îòìå÷àåòñÿ ñíèæåíèå âûñîòû ìàêðîñòðîáèëà â 2,2 ðàçà, âàðèàöèè äàííîãî ïîêàçàòåëÿ â ïðåäåëàõ îäíîãî ãîäà íå ïðåâûøàþò ñðåäíèõ çíà÷åíèé. Ñòàòèñòè÷åñêèå çíà÷èìûå ðàçëè÷èÿ ìåæäó äëèíîé øèøåê ôîíîâîãî äðåâîñòîÿ è äåðåâüåâ, ïðîèçðàñòàþùèõ íà ó÷àñòêàõ ñ ðàçíîé èíòåíñèâíîñòüþ çàãðÿçíåíèÿ, íå âûÿâëåíû. Òàêèì îáðàçîì, â èññëåäóåìîì äèàïàçîíå ïðèðîäíî-êëèìàòè÷åñêèõ óñëîâèé îòêëèê æåíñêîé ãåíåðàòèâíîé ñôåðû ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé íà òåõíîãåííîå âîçäåéñòâèå ïðîÿâëÿåòñÿ ëèøü â îòäåëüíûå ãîäû ñ íåáëàãîïðèÿòíûìè êëèìàòè÷åñêèìè õàðàêòåðèñòèêàìè â íà÷àëüíûå ïåðèîäû åå ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ. Áîëåå îò÷åòëèâî ýôôåêò ïðîÿâëÿåòñÿ ïî ýíåðãèè ïðîðàñòàíèÿ ñåìÿí, ÷òî ñîãëàñóåòñÿ ñ äàííûìè äðóãèõ èññëåäîâàòåëåé.

Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ñîñíà, æåíñêèå øèøêè, ñåìåíà, òåõíîãåííîå çàãðÿçíåíèå, êëèìàò

Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê

 

1. Ïðèäà÷à, Â.Á. Ìîðôîôèçèîëîãè÷åñêàÿ ðåàêöèÿ Pinus sylvestris L. è Picea obovata Ledeb. ïðè òåõíîãåííîì âîçäåéñòâèè â óñëîâèÿõ ñåâåðî-çàïàäà Ðîññèè / Â.Á. Ïðèäà÷à, Ò.À. Ñàçîíîâà, Ò.Þ. Òàëàíîâà, À.Â. Îëü÷åâ // Ýêîëîãèÿ. – 2011. – ¹ 1. – Ñ. 25–33.

2. Àíòèïîâ, Â.Ã. Óñòîé÷èâîñòü äðåâåñíûõ ðàñòåíèé ê ïðîìûøëåííûì ãàçàì. / Â.Ã. Àíòèïîâ. – Ìèíñê: Íàóêà è òåõíèêà, 1979. – 216 ñ.

3. Âàõíèíà, È.Ë. Õàðàêòåðèñòèêà ñåìÿí ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé â çåëåíîé çîíå ã. ×èòû (Âîñòî÷íîå Çàáàéêàëüå) / È.Ë. Âàõíèíà // Âåñòíèê ÊðàñÃÀÓ. – 2009. –¹ 8. – Ñ. 98–103.

4. Ôåäîðêîâ, À.Ë. Âëèÿíèå àýðîòåõíîãåííûõ çàãðÿçíåíèé íà ñîõðàííîñòü ñåìÿïî÷åê è ðàçâèòèå çàðîäûøà ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé / À.Ë. Ôåäîðêîâ // Ëåñîâåäåíèå. – 1994. – ¹ 5. – Ñ. 36–40.

5. Àíèêååâ, Ä.Ð. Äèôôåðåíöèàöèÿ äåðåâüåâ ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé ïî êîìïëåêñó ïðèçíàêîâ æåíñêîé ðåïðîäóêòèâíîé ñèñòåìû â óñëîâèÿõ ïðîìûøëåííîãî çàãðÿçíåíèÿ / Ä.Ð. Àíèêååâ, Ë.Ã. Áàáóøêèíà // Ëåñîâåäåíèå. – 1997. – ¹ 5. – Ñ.43–50.

6. Ýêîëîãî-ãåîõèìè÷åñêàÿ êàðòà ã. ×èòû [Êàðòû]. / ñîñò. è ïîäãîò. ê ïå÷àòè Çàáàéêàëüñêèì àýðîãåäåçè÷åñêèì ïðåäïðèÿòèåì Ðîñêàðòîãðàôèè â 1999 ã.; îòâ. ðåä. Ð. Í. Âîëîñèêîâ. – 1 : 30 000 – ×èòà: Çàáàéê. àýðîãåîäåç. ïðåäïð., 1998.

7. Áîáðèíåâ, Â.Ï. Ñåìÿíîøåíèå ñîñíû è ëèñòâåííèöû â Âîñòî÷íîì Çàáàéêàëüå / Â.Ï. Áîáðèíåâ // Ëåñîâåäåíèå. – 1985. – ¹ 4. – Ñ. 62–65.

8. Ìàìàåâ, Ñ.À. Ôîðìû âíóòðèâèäîâîé èçìåí÷èâîñòè äðåâåñíûõ ðàñòåíèé (íà ïðèìåðå ñåìåéñòâà Pinaceae íà Óðàëå). / Ñ.À. Ìàìàåâ. – Ì.: Íàóêà, 1972. – 284 ñ.

9. Âàõíèíà, È.Ë. Ðàäèàëüíûé ïðèðîñò ñîñíû îáûêíîâåííîé â çåëåíîé çîíå ã. ×èòû âî âòîðîé ïîëîâèíå ïðîøëîãî ñòîëåòèÿ / È.Ë. Âàõíèíà // Ãåîãðàôèÿ è ïðèðîäíûå ðåñóðñû. – 2011. – ¹ 1. – Ñ. 180–182.

10. Ïàâëîâ, È.Í. Äèíàìèêà ïîñåâíûõ êà÷åñòâ ñåìÿí Larix sibirica Ledeb. â íàñàæäåíèÿõ þãà Ñèáèðè ñ 1936 ïî 2000 ãã./ È.Í. Ïàâëîâ, À. Ã. Ìèðîíîâ // Õâîéíûå áîðåàëüíîé çîíû. – 2003. – ¹ 1. – Ñ. 14–21.

 

MORPHOBIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PINE GENERATIVE 
ORGANSIN THE NATURAL AND ANTHROPOGENIC 
CONDITIONS (EASTERN ZABAIKALSK)

Vakhnina I.L., Research Fellow of the Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology SB RAS, Candidate. biol. Science; Makarov V.P., Head of the Laboratory of plant resources of the Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology SB RAS, Candidate. biol. Sciences

vahnina_il@mail.ru
Institute of natural resources, ecology and cryology SB RAS (INREC SB RAS), 672014, Chita, Nedorezov street, 16a

Results of morphological reaction of the female generative sphere of pine treesstudy in conditions with various intensity of man-causedimpact with changing air temperatures and precipitation during vegetation period are given. Ripedcarpellatecones takenfrom model trees in 2008-2009 serve as a research material. Beforetheconesopeningtheir length was measured (height of macrostrobiluscentral axis). Thenconesweredried biologically until seeds fall from them. Seed sprouting for determine their quality was conductedat the premises of Chita seed station, according to the State Standards 13056.6-97 and 14161-86. Germinability and germination power served as diagnostic criteria for seeds quality valuation. Macrostrobilus height measurement allowedto identify significant differences between cones of 2008 and 2009 harvests. Thus, cones riped in 2009 in comparison with the previous year have shortening of macrostrobilus central axis2-2.6 times. Their average length on the sections varied from 1.2 cm to 1.5 cm (1.5 cm on the control), while for pine conesripedin 2008 it ranged from 3.9 to 2.9 cm (3.1 cm control). It is determined that in each area cones of the same ripening stage are characterized by stable height macrostrobilus, their coefficient of variation does not exceed low (C=8-12%) and medium (C=13-20%) level. Cones of background area model trees also have a decrease of macrostrobilusheight 2.2 times from year to year, variation of this indicator within one year do not exceed the average values. Statistically significant differences between the length of background stands and trees cones, growing on areas with different pollution intensity, are not found. Thus, in the investigated range of natural climatic conditions the female generative sphere of Scots pine response on anthropogenic impact becomes evident only in respective years with unfavourable climatic characteristics of its formationinitial stages. The effect becomes more evidentthanks to the seeds germinativepower, that is consistent with other researchers’ data.

Key words: pine, carpellate cone, seeds, technogenic pollution, climate

 

References

 

1. Pridacha V.B., Sazonova T.A., Talanova T.Yu., Ol’chev A.V. Morfofiziologicheskaya reaktsiya Pinus sylvestris L. i Picea obovata Ledeb. pri tekhnogennom vozdeystvii v usloviyakh severo-zapada Rossii[Morphophysiological reaction Pinus sylvestris L. and Picea obovata Ledeb. at technogenic influence in the conditions of Northwest Russia]. Ekologiya. 2011. ¹ 1. pp. 25-33.

2. Antipov V.G. Ustoychivost’ drevesnykh rasteniy k promyshlennym gazam [Sustainability of woody plants for industrial gases]. Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika, 1979. 216 p.

3. Vakhnina I.L. Kharakteristika semyan sosny obyknovennoy v zelenoy zone g. Chity (Vostochnoe Zabaykal’e) [Feature pine seeds in the green city of Chita (Eastern Transbaikalia)]. Vestnik KrasGAU. 2009. ¹ 8. pp. 98-103.

4. Fedorkov A.L. Vliyanie aerotekhnogennykh zagryazneniy na sokhrannost’ semyapochek i razvitie zarodysha sosny obyknovennoy [Influence of environmental contamination on the safety of the ovules and embryo development of Scots pine]. Lesovedenie. 1994. ¹ 5. pp. 36-40.

5. Anikeev D.R., Babushkina L.G. Differentsiatsiya derev’ev sosny obyknovennoy po kompleksu priznakov zhenskoy reproduktivnoy sistemy v usloviyakh promyshlennogo zagryazneniya [Differentiation of Scots pine trees on a set of attributes of the female reproductive system in terms of industrial pollution]. Lesovedenie. 1997. 5. pp.43-50.

6. Ekologo-geokhimicheskaya karta g. Chity [Karty] / sost. i podgot. k pechati Zabaykal’skim aerogedezicheskim predpriyatiem Roskartografii v 1999 g.; otv. red. R. N. Volosikov [Ecological-geochemical map of the city of Chita [Maps]]. 1 : 30 000. Chita. Zabayk. aerogeodez. predpr., 1998.

7. Bobrinev V.P. Semyanoshenie sosny i listvennitsy v Vostochnom Zabaykal’e [Semyanoshenie pine and larch in East Transbaikalia]. Lesovedenie. 1985. ¹ 4. pp. 62-65.

8. Mamaev S.A. Formy vnutrividovoy izmenchivosti drevesnykh rasteniy (na primere semeystva Pinaceae na Urale) [Forms of intraspecific variation of woody plants (for example, family Pinaceae in the Urals)]. Moscow. Nauka, 1972. 284 p.

9. Vakhnina I.L. Radial’nyy prirost sosny obyknovennoy v zelenoy zone g. Chity vo vtoroy polovine proshlogo stoletiya [Radial growth of Scots pine in the green city of Chita in the second half of the last century]. Geografiya i prirodnye resursy. 2011. ¹ 1. pp. 180-182.

10. Pavlov I.N., Mironov A.G. Dinamika posevnykh kachestv semyan Larix sibirica Ledeb. v nasazhdeniyakh yuga Sibiri s 1936 po 2000 gg. [Dynamics of sowing qualities of seeds Larix sibirica Ledeb. plantations in the south of Siberia from 1936 to 2000.]. Khvoynye boreal’noy zony. 2003. ¹ 1. pp. 14-21.

 

 

 

4

ÐÅÇÓËÜÒÀÒÛ ÈÑÑËÅÄÎÂÀÍÈß ÄÐÅÂÅÑÍÎ-ÊÎËÜÖÅÂÛÕ ÕÐÎÍÎËÎÃÈÉ ÑÎÑÍßÊÎÂ, ÏÐÎÈÇÐÀÑÒÀÞÙÈÕ ÍÀ ÒÎÐÔßÍÛÕ ÏÎ×ÂÀÕ

26-30

Â.Ñ. ÂÅÐÍÎÄÓÁÅÍÊÎ, äîö. êàô. ëåñíîãî õîçÿéñòâà Âîëîãîäñêîé ãîñóäàðñòâåííîé ìîëî÷íîõîçÿéñòâåííîé àêàäåìèè èì. Í.Â. Âåðåùàãèíà, êàíä. ñ.-õ. íàóê

quercus45@mail.ru
ÔÃÁÎÓ ÂÏÎ ÂÃÌÕÀ èì. Í.Â. Âåðåùàãèíà, 160555, Âîëîãäà-Ìîëî÷íîå, óë. Øìèäòà, ä. 2

 ñòàòüå ïðèâåäåíû ðåçóëüòàòû îáðàáîòêè êåðíîâ è ñïèëîâ ñ 20 ïðîáíûõ ïëîùàäåé. Öåëüþ ïðîâåäåííûõ èññëåäîâàíèé ñòàëà îöåíêà âëèÿíèÿ êëèìàòè÷åñêèõ ôàêòîðîâ íà äèíàìèêó ðàäèàëüíîãî ïðèðîñòà ñîñíîâûõ äðåâîñòîåâ ïðè ðàçëè÷íûõ òèïàõ çàáîëà÷èâàíèÿ ïî÷â â Âîëîãîäñêîé îáëàñòè. Âñÿ ìåòîäèêà ðàáîò ñâîäèëàñü ê îïðåäåëåíèþ ìîðôîëîãè÷åñêîé ñòðóêòóðû íàñàæäåíèé (ïîðîäíûé ñîñòàâ, âûñîòà, äèàìåòð, âîçðàñò) è ãîðèçîíòàëüíîé è âåðòèêàëüíîé äèôôåðåíöèàöèÿì äåðåâüåâ, ñîâìåñòíî ñ áîíèòåòîì è çàïàñîì. Äëÿ äåíäðîõðîíîëîãè÷åñêîãî èññëåäîâàíèÿ èñïîëüçîâàëèñü ñïèëû è êåðíû ñ äåðåâüåâ, êîòîðûå îòáèðàëèñü íà âûñîòíîé îòìåòêå 0,65 ì [1–5].  õîäå ðàáîò áûëî áûëè ïîëó÷åíû âûâîäû î òîì, ÷òî äëÿ ñîñíû ðàñòóùåé íà òîðôÿíûõ òåððèòîðèÿõ õàðàêòåðíà íåáîëüøàÿ âåëè÷èíà ïîãîäè÷íîé èçìåí÷èâîñòè øèðèíû ðàäèàëüíîãî ïðèðîñòà. À òàêæå â áîëüøèíñòâå ñëó÷àåâ èçìåí÷èâîñòü òåìïåðàòóðíîãî ðåæèìà îêðóæàþùåé ñðåäû è òîðôÿíûõ ïî÷â èç-çà èõ âûñîêîé òåïëîèçîëÿöèîííîé ñïîñîáíîñòè íå îêàçûâàåò çíà÷èìîãî âëèÿíèÿ è âíîñèò íåçíà÷èòåëüíûé âêëàä â ôîðìèðîâàíèå è âåëè÷èíó ïðèðîñòà ñîñíû. ×òî êàñàåòñÿ îñàäêîâ – èõ èçìåí÷èâîñòü èìååò îïðåäåëÿþùåå âîçäåéñòâèå íà ðîñò ñîñíû ïî äèàìåòðó. Ñòîèò îòìåòèòü, ÷òî ïî ìåðå íàñûùåííîñòè òîðôîâ âëàãîé â äðåâîñòîÿõ óâåëè÷èâàåòñÿ âëèÿíèå îñàäêîâ íà øèðèíó ãîäè÷íûõ êîëåö. Ïîëó÷åííûå êîýôôèöèåíòû ÷óâñòâèòåëüíîñòè (0,22-0,36) óêàçûâàþò íà òî, ÷òî èçìåí÷èâîñòü èíäåêñîâ ïðèðîñòà íåçíà÷èòåëüíà. ×òî óêàçûâàåò, íà îäíîðîäíóþ ñòåïåíü ðåàêöèè äåðåâüåâ â äàííûõ ëåñîðàñòèòåëüíûõ óñëîâèÿõ íà èçìåíåíèÿ âíåøíèõ ôàêòîðîâ. Êîýôôèöèåíòû êîððåëÿöèè ìåæäó èíäèâèäóàëüíûìè õðîíîëîãèÿìè â áîëüøèíñòâå ñëó÷àåâ ïîêàçàëè çíà÷èòåëüíóþ è âûñîêóþ òåñíîòó ñâÿçè ìåæäó ðàçìåðàìè ïðèðîñòà ó äåðåâüåâ. Ñâÿçü â êîëåáàíèÿõ øèðèíû ãîäè÷íûõ êîëåö, êîëè÷åñòâåííî îöåíåíà ïîêàçàòåëåì ñîîòíîøåíèÿ «ñèãíàë-øóì». «Ñèãíàë» äëÿ âñåõ îáúåêòîâ â 9 – 19 ðàç áîëüøå, ÷åì èçìåíåíèå âåëè÷èíû ïðèðîñòà, âûçâàííîå èíäèâèäóàëüíûìè îñîáåííîñòÿìè äåðåâüåâ («øóì»).

Êëþ÷åâûå ñëîâà: ñîñíà, ðàäèàëüíûé ïðèðîñò, òåìïåðàòóðà, îñàäêè

Áèáëèîãðàôè÷åñêèé ñïèñîê

 

1. Ðèõòåð, È.Ý. Âëèÿíèå áèîëîãè÷åñêîé ìåëèîðàöèè è ïåðèîäè÷åñêîãî íåäîñòàòêà âëàãè íà äèíàìèêó ïðèðîñòà ó ñîñíû è åëè // Äåíäðîêëèìàòè÷åñêèå èññëåäîâàíèÿ â ÑÑÑÐ: Ìàòåðèàëû 3 Âñåñîþçíîé êîíôåðåíöèè ïî äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãèè. – Àðõàíãåëüñê, 1978 – Ñ. 142–143

2. Ïåòðèê, Í.È. Ó÷åò ýôôåêòèâíîñòè ëåñîîñóøåíèÿ äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãè÷åñêèì ñïîñîáîì â íåêîòîðûõ òèïàõ ëåñà Àðõàíãåëüñêîãî ëåñõîçà / Í.È. Ïåòðèê, Ï.À. Ôåêëèñòîâ // Äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãè÷åñêèå èññëåäîâàíèÿ â ÑÑÑÐ: Ìàòåðèàëû 3-é Âñåñîþçíîé êîíôåðåíöèè ïî äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãèè. – Àðõàíãåëüñê, 1978 – Ñ. 174.

3. Êóêóøêèí, Å.Í. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå ãîäè÷íîãî ñëîÿ äðåâåñèíû â îñóøåííîì è óäîáðåííîì ñîñíÿêå / Å.Í. Êóêóøêèí // Äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãè÷åñêèå èññëåäîâàíèÿ â ÑÑÑÐ: Ìàòåðèàëû 3-é Âñåñîþçíîé êîíôåðåíöèè ïî äåíäðîêëèìàòîëîãèè. Àðõàíãåëüñê, 1978 – Ñ. 93.

4. Ëîâåëèóñ, Í.Â. Ðàäèàëüíûé ïðèðîñò ñîñíû â ñôàãíîâûõ ñîñíÿêàõ ëåñíîé çîíû Ðîññèè è ãëîáàëüíûå ôàêòîðû ñðåäû / Í.Â. Ëîâåëèóñ, Ê.Í. Äüÿêîíîâ, Ñ.Á. Ïàëü÷èêîâ, À.Þ. Ðåòåþì è äð. // Îáùåñòâî. Ñðåäà. Ðàçâèòèå, 2013. – ¹ 4 (29). – Ñ. 251–259.

5. Ñòðàâèíñêåíå, Â.Ï. Äèíàìèêà ðàííåé è ïîçäíåé äðåâåñèíû â ãîäè÷íûõ êîëüöàõ äåðåâüåâ è åå èçìåíåíèå âñëåäñòâèå îñóøåíèÿ / Â.Ï. Ñòðàâèíñêåíå // Ëåñîâåäåíèå, 1983, ¹ 6 – Ñ. 29–34

6. Ïüÿâ÷åíêî, Í.È. Î íàó÷íûõ îñíîâàõ êëàññèôèêàöèè áîëîòíûõ áèîãåîöåíîçîâ / Í.È. Ïüÿâ÷åíêî // Òèïû áîëîò ÑÑÑÐ è ïðèíöèïû èõ êëàññèôèêàöèè. – Ë.: Íàóêà, 1974. – Ñ. 35–43.

7. Ñóêà÷¸â, Â.Í. Ìåòîäè÷åñêèå óêàçàíèÿ ê èçó÷åíèþ òèïîâ ëåñà / Â.Í. Ñóêà÷¸â, Ñ.Â. Çîíí. – Ì.: ÀÍ ÑÑÑÐ, 1961. – 144 ñ.

8. Ìàçåïà, Â.Ñ. Ñîâðåìåííûå ïîäõîäû ïðè èçó÷åíèè äåíäðîõðîíîëîãè÷åñêîé èíôîðìàöèè è àíàëèçà âðåìåííûõ ðÿäîâ / Â.Ñ. Ìàçåïà. – Êðàñíîÿðñê: Ïðåïðèíò ÈÔ ÑÎ ÀÍ ÑÑÑÐ, 1984. – 51 ñ.

9. Ìàçåïà, Â.Ñ. Ïðîñòðàíñòâåííî-âðåìåííàÿ èçìåí÷èâîñòü ðàäèàëüíîãî ïðèðîñòà õâîéíûõ âèäîâ äåðåâüåâ â ñóáàðêòè÷åñêèõ ðàéîíàõ Åâðàçèè: äèññ. ... ä-ðà áèîë. íàóê / Â.Ñ. Ìàçåïà. – Åêàòåðèíáóðã, 1998 – 38 ñ.

10. Øèÿòîâ, Ñ.Ã. Ìåòîäû äåíäðîõðîíîëîãèè. ×. 1. Îñíîâû äåíäðîõðîíîëîãèè. Ñáîð è ïîëó÷åíèå äðåâåñíî-êîëüöíâîé èíôîðìàöèè. Ó÷åáíî-ìåòîäè÷åñêîå ïîñîáèå / Ñ.Ã. Øèÿòîâ, Å.À. Âàãàíîâ, À.Â. Êèðäÿíîâ, Â.Á. Êðóãëîâ, Â.Ñ. Ìàçåïà, Ì.Ì. Íàóçáàåâ, Ð.Ì. Õàíòåìèðîâ. – Êðàñíîÿðñê: ÊðàñÃÓ, 2000. – 80 ñ.

11. Æàâîðîíêîâ, Þ.Ì. Èñïîëüçîâàíèå ìåòîäîâ äåíäðîõðîíîëîãèè â ñóäåáíî-áîòàíè÷åñêèõ ýêñïåðòèçàõ, ïðîèçâîäèìûõ íà áàçå ÝÊÖ ÓÂÄ ïî Âîëîãîäñêîé îáëàñòè, ïðè ðàññëåäîâàíèè ïðåñòóïëåíèé ïî íåçàêîííûì ðóáêàì ëåñà / Þ.Ì. Æàâîðîíêîâ // Êðèìèíàëèñòè÷åñêèå ñðåäñòâà è ìåòîäû â ðàñêðûòèè è ðàññëåäîâàíèè ïðåñòóïëåíèé. – Ì.: ÝÊÖ ÌÂÄ ÐÔ, 2009. – Ñ. 203–206.

 

RESULTS OF TREE-RING CHRONOLOGIES RESEACH 
OF PINE FORESTS GROWING ON PEAT SOILS

Vernodubenko V.S., Associate Professor, Department of Forestry FSBEE VPO N.V. Vereshchagin VSMA

quercus45@mail.ru
FSBEE VPO N.V. Vereshchagin VSMA, 160555, Vologda-Molochnoe, Shmidta st., 2

The article contains the results of processing of cores and saw cuts from 20 sample plots. The aim of the research was evaluation of climatic factors influence on the dynamics of radial growth of pine stands with different type of soils waterlogging in Vologda region. The whole methodology came down to the plants morphological structure determination (species composition, height, diameter, age) and to horizontal and ver